SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17129Charlie, Hal and all: Has anyone noticed that the support for AEXCA below 40 haDave Heibeck-3/24/2005
17128I'd have to believe you're right, Hal. Hitachi is the gorilla in this maAmboy Charlie-3/24/2005
17127OT Haven't looked closely at LEXR, Charlie, but unless that party...forget Hal Campbell-3/24/2005
17126OT - LEXR could prove to be a speculative play as profitable as Ampex, here'Amboy Charlie-3/24/2005
17125Yeah I know, I just wish I'd taken the eight thousand I put into Ampex and pAmboy Charlie-3/24/2005
17124Off Topic glanced at the Lexar - Toshiba verdict, Charlie. Yeah that looks pretHal Campbell-3/23/2005
17123You don't need to tell an old Ampexer about appeals, Hal. The memory of whatAmboy Charlie-3/23/2005
17122Excellent, Charlie! (beware the appeal) In my opinion, specifically because oHal Campbell-3/23/2005
17121Looks like LEXR will do quite nicely, Hal. They just won a $381 million judgemenAmboy Charlie-3/23/2005
17120LEXR is a huge money loser on its way to bankruptcy, but the action today was faAmboy Charlie-3/23/2005
17119Made sense to me, Charlie. Unrelated fragments of information are one of the benHal Campbell-3/23/2005
17118Guess something about that last message of mine seems like a non sequitur doesn&Amboy Charlie-3/23/2005
17117Appreciate the link, Hal, and no I hadn't read it. I had LEXR on my watch liAmboy Charlie-3/23/2005
17116This is probably what you already read, Charlie, but here's a link. I'llHal Campbell-3/22/2005
17115Hal, No I don't know what they meant by that. That is why I posted it. SeemAmboy Charlie-3/22/2005
17114<<the entire infringing process is within the U.S>> Charlie, do youHal Campbell-3/22/2005
17113This was from the NTP v. RIM announcement. Can anyone interpret this and tell meAmboy Charlie-3/22/2005
17112Hi Carol, I e-mailed Karen Dexter a while back and she relayed the date as wellThomas Kirwin-3/21/2005
17111Can you tell me what time and where the annual meeting will be.......I hope to mCarol M. Morse-3/21/2005
17110One more babble. Let's assume for a moment that all goes very well, and by tHal Campbell-3/21/2005
17109Was just making a very lowball estimate, of course. If Kodak settles (or loses) Hal Campbell-3/21/2005
17108Thanks for the information, OPVet. As they say in the Qs, I doubt if that would Hal Campbell-3/21/2005
17107Hal, This might be far-fetched based on HP problems after acquiring Compaq,OPVet-3/21/2005
17106Thanks Paul. Olympus has a large chunk of the market,but Sanyo manufactures thHal Campbell-3/21/2005
17105Richard, The late action Friday could have been just a light bounce on the techAmboy Charlie-3/21/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News