SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19080 389 0 ORCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17130You can apologize for most Nasdaq stocks >>> Link: charts.infospace.coQualified Opinion-6/5/2002
17129I'm sorry to say it folks, I also own ORCL but at least for the short term, ehasfjord-6/5/2002
17128Robert, I am sorry to hear about your father. We have at least a few things in Qualified Opinion-6/5/2002
17127Hi Rob, I can't Great Idea Now your talikin, My Dad thru living his life trobert b furman-6/4/2002
17126No...Yes...Yes! <G> L.Lonnie-6/4/2002
17125Robert, it might be time for you to retire, take a long vacation, or average dowQualified Opinion-6/4/2002
17124Pavlovian theory - I guess I'm getting conditioned to depression. He said trobert b furman-6/4/2002
17123JakeStraw, some analysts adjust their speculative comments according to their eqQualified Opinion-6/4/2002
17122Jerome, it comes down to greed and money. Obviously, no concern about accountabQualified Opinion-6/4/2002
17121>>>I think the only basis for them getting on TV was there physical appJerome-6/4/2002
17120I certainly haven't done that, and I don't recall anyone else making preHardly B. Solipsist-6/4/2002
17119Yeah, I mean a lot of them are justing running hypothetical numbers through theiJakeStraw-6/4/2002
17118Actually, you can't place it squarely on their calls, but you can't helpMeDroogies-6/4/2002
17117Their "professional" opinion is what I've always questioned. How MeDroogies-6/4/2002
17116Why is that wrong?JakeStraw-6/4/2002
17115Hi Jake Something is wrong - we're up?? Bobrobert b furman-6/4/2002
17114Great idea if you feel you must.JakeStraw-6/4/2002
17113I am posting this link as a reference for myself .. Link: sec.govQualified Opinion-6/4/2002
17112Fine, but you can't blame Oracles woes, or the drop in ORCL squarley on bad JakeStraw-6/4/2002
17111Actually several people that post on this thread have been consistently negativeHardly B. Solipsist-6/4/2002
17110Confirmation of quiet period in effect > listen > link > Link: bloombeQualified Opinion-6/4/2002
17109They give their 'professional' opinion. It's up to who's ever liJakeStraw-6/4/2002
17108Actually, I've always whined about the analysts, even when they've been MeDroogies-6/4/2002
17107They have been stepping "over the line" as you you put it for a long tJakeStraw-6/4/2002
17106I usually ignore analysts. However, there is a point where they step over the liQualified Opinion-6/4/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News