Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
17679	72	0	AMPX

Emcee: Gus	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
17154	Apologies. My language was way too vague and a poster on Yahoo misunderstood. Me	Hal Campbell	-	3/30/2005
17153	In his statement that Ampex has yet to fully utilize its array of witnesses, the	Hal Campbell	-	3/30/2005
17152	Finally saw the order from Judge Barton. It isn't so favorable to Ampex. It	Amboy Charlie	-	3/30/2005
17151	Doesn't work for me DrD. But the fact that it's dated the 22nd and they	Amboy Charlie	-	3/29/2005
17150	Hi John, Only connected via being both partnered with Cybernet and being located	Harvey H Anderson	-	3/28/2005
17149	Charlie, The actual contents were not available. What I posted is the lead-in st	DrD	-	3/28/2005
17148	Is Aampex still connected to IMMR? story.news.yahoo.com	john b	-	3/28/2005
17147	Thanks Count. However I have heard that Karen has given assurances that, rega	Hal Campbell	-	3/28/2005
17146	Dr. D, I went to EDIS and didn't find it listed. What is your source and wha	Amboy Charlie	-	3/28/2005
17145	Hal, you're correct that Ampex can file late--because it isn't subject t	Countbugula	-	3/28/2005
17144	The following is a partial response from the ITC (03/22/05) with regard to one o	DrD	-	3/28/2005
17143	Hal, et al: A comment: If I were making decisions, god forbid, I would be cont	Dave Heibeck	-	3/27/2005
17142	PJ, I glanced at the substantial options out there for Ampex officers. Granted s	Hal Campbell	-	3/27/2005
17141	from Barron's Ampex (AEXCA-OTC) by Dutton Associates (41, March 23) Ampex a	Paul Lee	-	3/26/2005
17140	That is a good thing, it's interesting to have the Journal mentioning any bu	chriscraft	-	3/26/2005
17139	There is a quick snippet (part of the regular section summarizing various stock	P Jones	-	3/26/2005
17138	I think they have about 8 more trading days above 5 to go before they can apply,	Hal Campbell	-	3/26/2005
17137	I Googled it and it looks pretty dubious to me. Discount Tape runs a small websi	Amboy Charlie	-	3/25/2005
17136	Does anyone think the Quantegy purchase will... ...ease somewhat Ampex's &l	Rampex	-	3/25/2005
17135	Ampex Question Apex's PPS has remained way above $5 now for a good long whi	Jaknik2	-	3/25/2005
17134	There are quite a few eyes watching Ampex besides the dusty long timers such as	chriscraft	-	3/25/2005
17133	Yeah noticed awhile back, Dave. Pretty tight ceiling too. A little over a 10% tr	Hal Campbell	-	3/25/2005
17132	I'm not a big fan of a split at this point either, Charlie...though it would	Hal Campbell	-	3/25/2005
17131	The only problem with your theory, Dave, is that the news doesn't always com	Amboy Charlie	-	3/24/2005
17130	hope this helps.http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=AEXCA.OB	funtimes_52	-	3/24/2005

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):