SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
18366 73 0 EDIG
Emcee:  JAMES F. CLASPILL III Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17166As things begin to "ramp up" for EDIGITAL, some caution is in order. MaryinRed-1/14/2001
17165Here's where you can get it: treoplayer.comStarlight-1/13/2001
17164TREO featured on Products On The Cutting Edge. Lookin good folks! potce.combob-1/13/2001
17163Wolanchuk calls for a "fast and furious" return to NASDAQ 5000.. articMaryinRed-1/13/2001
17162Edigital Links compiled: egroups.com in particular, check this out...EDIGITAL sMaryinRed-1/13/2001
17161<i>You see, I am willing to admit that e.Digital is not a lock to succeed.cAPSLOCK-1/13/2001
17160*OT Reply* <i>>>>switching off my new cold-fusion powered gyrosccAPSLOCK-1/13/2001
17159And the sun shone down and a fragile peace reigned for now...and the gods saw tTodd Pagel-1/12/2001
17158JimC, I am glad that you have decided to moderate your tone. I think that if otJon Tara-1/12/2001
17157Jon, I have probably been your most vociferous critic on this message board. AJimC1997-1/12/2001
17156PartyTime, the question was answered. I concur with the answer, and the answer tJon Tara-1/12/2001
17155>>>switching off my new cold-fusion powered gyroscope balanced unicyclePartyTime-1/12/2001
17154Hey, I thought it was a fair question. And I write this having carried the follPartyTime-1/12/2001
17153Industry leaders are no-shows at digital music conference news.cnet.comJon Tara-1/12/2001
17152And your point is? Burt? Why am I to be restricted to commenting only on the valJon Tara-1/12/2001
17151JT: Your comments on the board have ranged wide afield of the subject (not theBurt Roger-1/12/2001
17150cool post from RB........... By: cksla $$$$ Reply To: 586725 by EarToTDave Swanson-1/12/2001
17149Burt, maybe I am misunderstanding your statement. It <b>was</b> a biJon Tara-1/12/2001
17148I am not exactly sure what you mean when you say "JT's comments have raBurt Roger-1/12/2001
17147Burt, EDIG may become a case of "the operation was a success, but the patieJon Tara-1/12/2001
17146Last was to cAps: Should be 'patronizingly'.Burt Roger-1/12/2001
17145cCaps: My wits are well arranged. I'm delighted that 24601 has assisted youBurt Roger-1/12/2001
17144OT - PTSC dismal results... Somebody mentioned one of EDIG's "sister&qJon Tara-1/12/2001
17143"You see, I am willing to admit that e.Digital is not a lock to succeed. BuJon Tara-1/12/2001
17142"Take the issue of the availability of the e.Digital-designed portable jukeJon Tara-1/12/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):