SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Carrington Laboratories (CARN)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
197 3 0 CARN
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
172 Patience is being rewarded here for shortsellers. The stock actually dropped beQ.-7/2/1997
171 Andrew, presumably this private placement was made to investors who are more liQ.-6/23/1997
170 Here we go again...While this announcement probably won't destroy the stockedgedirect-6/23/1997
169 Here we go again...While this announcement probably won't destroy the stockedgedirect-6/23/1997
168 Andrew, two things. First, a company recognizes no profit or loss on the incoQ.-6/10/1997
167 John,<<Therefore, the payment of the premium will not impact earnings peredgedirect-6/9/1997
166 Here is the co's 8-k disclosing the buyback of the convertible preferred. Q.-6/9/1997
165 Larry, Christopher Record is still there. I think he's the corporate counseQ.-6/5/1997
164 Re: "Not a good sign even in a healthy company?" Carl, let's notLarry Leeth-6/5/1997
163 << The company said no replacement was named to take Pantermuehl's plQ.-6/4/1997
162 Here is some news hot off the cactus, so to speak: CARRINGTON LABS INC said thCarl Yee-6/3/1997
161 Closed today below 7 on low volume of 29 k shares. This is a nice and smooth deQ.-6/3/1997
160 Chester, Carl and others: I've created some new threads on stock shorting. Q.-5/29/1997
159 <<Gum Tech's Calcium Supplement Gum offers a unique delivery system Q.-5/28/1997
158 I'm posting this article on GUMM (gum tech) on CARN because: 1. there is nchester lee-5/28/1997
157 Here's some valuation analysis. Let's look at book, revenues, cashflowQ.-5/22/1997
156 John, As you say.....this stock is certainly not worth 8.50 and I agree that wCHUBfitz-5/20/1997
155 The only thing that has happened to this company in the last 2 weeks is the decQ.-5/20/1997
154 Thanks Scott.....this stock has become very worrisome and could be dangerous toCHUBfitz-5/19/1997
153 CARN recommended today as "stock of the day" by a stock picking newslScott C Gottlieb-5/19/1997
152 <<As someone fairly new to this, is all this inside manipulation legal? SCHUBfitz-5/18/1997
151 I was also short from $7.50 and covered at $5.50--figured I 'd take the 30%Ocote-5/17/1997
150 <This could mean a couple of things. #1 The preferred folks never were shortchester lee-5/16/1997
149 Good explanation, John. One of the nice things about Lombard's web is it sCarl Yee-5/16/1997
148 Here's simple proof of the complete stupidity of CARN's management. TheQ.-5/16/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):