SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
HWP -- Hewlett Packard
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4722 63 0 HPQ
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1720 Not this time C.C. . . . too much competition (cpq $799 220Mhz Cyrix anyone) a Buckeye-12/10/1997
1719 To Craig--"Up to $60" ????? I hope not, that would be hardly bold. Fred Levine-12/10/1997
1718 Thanks for the article Craig. I'm looking forward to 1998 being a good yearTim Bagwell-12/10/1997
1717 Kirk, now I know what to get my wife for Christmas. BobOeconomicus-12/10/1997
1716 On Lew Platt....<i>He's a man with class.</i> Yes, and did youKirk ©-12/10/1997
1715 Tim, just got my special issue of Worth in the mail. (Investment Outlook 1998) craig crawford-12/10/1997
1714 When they were trying to impress Lew with one early version of a digital cameraTim Bagwell-12/10/1997
1713 I doubt that the conservative profile will change but we should start to see soTim Bagwell-12/10/1997
1712 I agree tim. You never would see that in the past. I seems to me that HP wantWilliam Partmann-12/9/1997
1711 <i>Kirk, Lew is a great guy but he doesn't show a lot of emotion. TheKirk ©-12/9/1997
1710 To All - HP kicks butt. To wit - <i>Although desktop sales for both CompTerry D-12/9/1997
1709 Kirk, Lew is a great guy but he doesn't show a lot of emotion. The fact thaTim Bagwell-12/9/1997
1708 Did anyone else see Lew Platt on NBR last night? NBR = Nightly Business Report Kirk ©-12/9/1997
1707 James-- I unloaded Fri as it may see 62-63 again soon! When it does and starts Captain Jack-12/6/1997
1706 RD, with the volume in HWP their was either a lot of short covering or some insJoan Osland Graffius-12/6/1997
1705 re: >>So much for for our bottom fishing eh Joan? Me too, I passed at seDiamond Jim-12/5/1997
1704 Dan--- I am another smart ass. Bought at 59 7/8 and out at 67 1/16. It may not Captain Jack-12/5/1997
1703 Joan, I'm the smart-ass that is boasting about buying at $61.00 and sellingDWW II-12/5/1997
1702 Joan, nice volume today. 5.8mm shares. That $66 level may be the new support. NOeconomicus-12/5/1997
1701 Metal Trader, >>So much for for our bottom fishing eh Joan? Clearly the Joan Osland Graffius-12/5/1997
1700 Looks like the analysists liked what they heard from the top HWP execs on Dec. Kirk ©-12/5/1997
1699 Buy at $ 61.00 and sell at $ 68.00. I now have my X-Mass Money. DWW IIDWW II-12/5/1997
1698 So much for for our bottom fishing eh Joan? Some days it just doesn't pay MetalTrader-12/5/1997
1697 to the thread: very interesting article at c/net.com news. Its a upbeat intervWilliam Partmann-12/4/1997
1696 <i>Kirk, heard something about intro of a new server line, beating CompaqKirk ©-12/3/1997
1695 Kirk, heard something about intro of a new server line, beating Compaq et al toOeconomicus-12/3/1997
1694 So....what news sparked the good rally in HWP today? Did some analyist just &quKirk ©-12/3/1997
1693 I quite agree with you. Stocks like this are boring from a volatile perspectiveDJRoss-12/2/1997
1692 Maybe boring isn't so bad when you look at the results: stockfever.com I&Alex-12/1/1997
1691 Hi MetalTrader, >>I haven't seen you say in any of your messages thatJoan Osland Graffius-11/27/1997
1690 Joan, I for one am always glad to see some simple contrariness in these sites.MetalTrader-11/27/1997
1689 R.D. I don't know. I'm sure there are people on this thread that can DWW II-11/26/1997
1688 Dan, glad to help out on the thread activity. Question: What portion of HWP'Oeconomicus-11/26/1997
1687 I'm glad to see so much activity on this thred. This past day has been betDWW II-11/26/1997
1686 R D--- I feel it will go above 70. Taxes are never a part of my decision to buyCaptain Jack-11/26/1997
1685 RD, For your information over the years I have used Stan Weinsteins guidance foJoan Osland Graffius-11/26/1997
1684 Joan, we all have our opinions and I appreciate you sharing yours. These threadOeconomicus-11/26/1997
1683 RD, I am not saying I am right on HWP. I just shared with you what I saw as welJoan Osland Graffius-11/26/1997
1682 mp, huh? We are discussing the merits of investing in HWP. Who is being "Oeconomicus-11/26/1997
1681 My point exactly. It is one thing to be positive about a stock. Entirely anotmp-11/26/1997
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News