Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer

An SI Board Since May 2007

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2121	25	0

Emcee: davidk555	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Posted
1721	Math...what I don't understand is why you try to defend the indefensible. Yo	Honey_Bee	10/26/2007
1720	Honey, you admit that it was not possible to be in a model portfolio after the N	Math Junkie	10/26/2007
1719	Well, Math, this is twice now that one of you brinker-apologists have tried to u	Honey_Bee	10/26/2007
1718	<i>Math Junkie said: "How was it possible to follow a model portfolio	Math Junkie	10/25/2007
1717	InvesTing asked: <<And in percentage terms Octavian just what would you e	octavian	10/24/2007
1716	Octavian said: "As far as I'm concerned, that one is over with. It is	InvesTing	10/24/2007
1715	zwei2, welcome to the wacky world of Brinker! Since you appear to be new here,	octavian	10/24/2007
1714	zwei2 asked: <<Is Bob's buying opportunity still in the S&P 500 m	octavian	10/24/2007
1713	" Is Bob's buying opportunity still in the S&P 500 mid 1400s? "	InvesTing	10/24/2007
1712	That's his latest buying opportunity. Of course the previous one at 1380 was	Honey_Bee	10/24/2007
1711	Is Bob's buying opportunity still in the S&P 500 mid 1400s?	the Zwei	10/24/2007
1710	Pick, pick, pick, stockie. Spin, spin, spin. <b> I lost more by not follo	queenleah	10/23/2007
1709	Queenie, I am again sorry for your losses following and not following Brinker	InvesTing	10/23/2007
1708	Now stockie, nice try at ending the "saga" on your terms. I do not agr	queenleah	10/23/2007
1707	Queenie, Thank you for hopefully and mercifully ending this saga. You admitted	InvesTing	10/23/2007
1706	Stockie, this is what you said way back in post #1645: <i>I'm sorry f	queenleah	10/23/2007
1705	I don't care a whit about "your actions" or what you invest in or	InvesTing	10/23/2007
1704	I trust you are not going to answer these questions: Why does it take so many w	queenleah	10/23/2007
1703	"Yes, we can agree to disagree that the QQQ call and how people followed it	InvesTing	10/23/2007
1702	<I>I never dreamed that oil could go into the 80s, and stay there, and tha	Kirk ©	10/23/2007
1701	Misinterpretation on your part again, stockie. You're confusing the issues.	queenleah	10/23/2007
1700	kirk asked: <<IF the FED had stopped raising rates at 4.0% as Brinker adv	octavian	10/23/2007
1699	Queenie said to InvesTing "I don't understand why some feel compelled	InvesTing	10/22/2007
1698	<I><<IF the FED had stopped raising rates at 4.0% as Brinker advised	Kirk ©	10/22/2007
1697	<I>But let me ask YOU a question. <B>When you started saying brinker	Kirk ©	10/22/2007

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):