| Reply | Message Preview | From | Recs | Posted |
| 17233 | Message 17726908 Posted elsewhere, worth a look for anyone interested in the va | Dayuhan | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17232 | <i>:@) </i> Which means? Not a standard emoticon. | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17231 | Japanese Study Finds Negative Correlation Between Playing Games, Brain Activit | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17230 | Methinks the lady doth protest too much. | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17229 | <b>:</b>@) | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17228 | Bush hasn't been put under oath. Neither has Cheney. I only hope this doesn& | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17227 | Okay, I'll discuss it. She was 53, I think, when she had the surgery. Isn&# | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17226 | Good post, Jewel. Good summary of the history behind this matter. | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17225 | <i>Can't they all just get along? </i> Remember how much good th | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17224 | <i>Of course a president can be impeached for lying under oath about somet | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17223 | And here I was trying to help you. I was trying to break your obsession with th | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17222 | <i>Really, I'm not out to get Bush.</i> Right. No smiley on tha | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17221 | That was soooo irresistible. I am bad. | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17220 | Of course a president can be impeached for lying under oath about something or o | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17219 | You're dead. Just dead. | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17218 | How Clintonesque of you. :-) | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17217 | There is an unsettled question as to whether a President can be impeached for ac | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17216 | Message 17726336 'Night. | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17215 | <i>I don't want Bush impeached. </i> Oh? Then what is the purpo | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17214 | Well, it's been fun joshin' you guys tonight, even though since I didn&# | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17213 | <i>. All the documents you need to see are available in the public domain. | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17212 | <i>During the Clinton administration, people worried at how much time was | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17211 | I'm so happy for you.... | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17210 | It depends on what the meaning of 'gone' is.... | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17209 | And when Scalia's wrong, he's wrong twice, because he operates Thomas | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17208 | Are you saying that Krugman made it up? Is this your idea, or have you some oth | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17207 | I agree with E. Message 17726044 These aren't impeachable offenses or even | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17206 | <i>Much ado about NOTHING..... </i> Probably is. But the democrats | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17205 | I'd agree on the "depends" for unilateral military action. I don& | Dayuhan | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17204 | I agree, Bush should ask the SEC to release all. I don't want Bush impeache | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17203 | <i>as it would to a whole lot of others who would be most surprised | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17202 | I don't know. Who was it? | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17201 | And the punch line is.....? | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17200 | Evidence? Other than Butler's word. | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17199 | If it was odd of God to choose the Jews, think how odd it is of man to choose F | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17198 | How silly. All the documents you need to see are available in the public domain | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17197 | They were investigating reality TreasonPuddy. I hear they also nixed your sugge | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17196 | Base! cnn.com <i>The most explosive charge, Paula, is that the Bush admin | TigerPaw | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17195 | <i>What do you think?</i> I think I will probably sleep through it. | Lane3 | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17194 | <i>...not jinx a multi-billion dollar pipeline deal with the Taliban.</ | one_less | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17193 | Ah, another of the wild, baseless charges you're so famous for. | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17192 | Sure it did, right after the part about Clinton declining to apprehend bin Laden | Bill | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17191 | <i> If President Bush is distracted from dealing with the wo | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17190 | Transsexual wins right to marry news.bbc.co.uk The case was at | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17189 | Let's cut to the chase: Message 17723394 I thought you were gone. :-) | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17188 | This investigation did not attempt to find out if the Bush Jr. administration pu | TigerPaw | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17187 | What percentage of his shares did he sell, btw? | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17186 | This article should be titled "<b>Some</b> of the Facts on Bush | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17185 | Let's have a little contest. Perhaps you caught this little EXONERATION toda | Bill | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17184 | WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE! A USSC justice is allowed to be wrong. Wouldn't be th | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17183 | <I>a letter saying he has not been exonerated</i> And where would t | Bill | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17182 | I think you must be a L... oh nevermind hee hee I'm leaving now, and I ME | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17181 | You are being positively Clintonesque! So it depends on what the meaning of &q | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17180 | Read the SEC memos synthesizing the thousands of documents they reviewed and the | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17179 | <i> I attribute that to the fact that for the believing Christian, death i | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17178 | <i>"You need to look back on the director's minutes," Bush s | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17177 | Now, if i take the time to go there will I truly discover that they have <i&g | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17176 | OK. JLA | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17175 | Wrong. Clinton's SEC exonerated Bush. By not referring it to Justice, exone | Bill | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17174 | The SEC documents have been released: www.publicintegrity.org | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17173 | Most of the important stuff has been released: www.publicintegrity.org | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17172 | But E, I was responding to your continued spreading of false information. Yester | Bill | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17171 | Message 17723394 | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17170 | <i> Should Bush ask the SEC to release all?</i> Yup. <i> Or s | Lazarus_Long | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17169 | I didn't say it was Clinton's fault. I stated the obvious....the fact t | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17168 | "No action" letters are all I have ever seen..... | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17167 | Laz, I don't want you to miss this one from OMD. Message 17722965 Should | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17166 | <i>Does the SEC ever issue "exoneration" letters? </i> I | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17165 | Especially in the current climate, in a context where Bush is calling on reforms | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17164 | <i>Bush should ask the SEC to release the entire file, and move on to the | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17163 | That answers nothing and exonerates nobody. It's beneath you. | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17162 | The SEC recommendation not to indict (or exonerate) was dated August 21, 1991. | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17161 | Does the SEC ever issue "exoneration" letters? I thought their crimina | Bill | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17160 | Bush should ask the SEC to release the entire file, and move on to the next issu | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17159 | Arthur Leavitt was appointed by Clinton. | Bill Grant | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17158 | Paul Krugman has proved himself a partisan fraud. He libeled a good company and | Bill | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17157 | Waitaminute. Wasn't the head of the SEC that refused to exonerate Bush Jr. a | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17156 | I was wondering how this was going to be <i>Clinton's</i> fault. | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17155 | Did you read the SEC documents at www.publicintegrity.org? You can hardly call | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17154 | I read the National Review defense of him and the piece you posted to me. White | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17153 | You haven't read the documents then..... | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17152 | No, I agree with the SEC that they don't exonerate him. But that there is i | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17151 | So, you agree then that the facts developed by the SEC exonerate Bush.... JLA | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17150 | We already did that here! Message 17720887 Message 17720939 siliconinvestor. | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17149 | Methinks they will be first with a "nuts" policy also. | Bill Grant | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17148 | Message 17718474 | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17147 | Shakin' my head in amazement.... | jlallen | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17146 | Thought you might find this amusing. Tucson, Arizona Thursday, 11 July 2002 | Lane3 | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17145 | <i>Maybe I'll put my poking-stick down now.</i> Here's a re | Lane3 | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17144 | Be careful your lungs don't pick up too much dust in Tucson. I was just rea | Lane3 | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17143 | Road trip tomorrow. After visiting cousins in Ruidoso, NM I'm going on to Tu | Tom Clarke | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17142 | Who was it that was ridiculing the Dems for being poll-driven? Now, I know the s | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17141 | When that study gets out the placebo effect will no longer exist. I'll also | Ish | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17140 | I'm glad somebody else saw the humor! Here, I think I'll poke Laz with | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17139 | I had that article teed up in another window to post to you. Another example of | Lane3 | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17138 | <i>They don't have the smoking gun, so he's not indictable, and th | Lane3 | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17137 | This article relates to the unfounded assumptions in medicine subject we were ta | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17136 | Look at this. But it raises a philosophical question, doesn't it? The questi | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17135 | Thursday, July 11, 2002 Bush Took Oil Firm's Loans as Director Practice Wo | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
| 17134 | <i>(And actually, based on that, I would fit that pigeon hole.) </i> | E | - | 7/11/2002 |
