SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Noise Cancellation Technology (NCTI)
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2775 25 0 NCTI
Emcee:  ronnie scott Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1725 No. Point made.Paul B. Mackey-1/28/1998
1724 Well I wish they would work harder at getting the stock up, Down nearly 6% ENOTS-1/28/1998
1723 NCTI already has some sort of deal with Johnson Controls to put the flat speakeTom Griffin-1/28/1998
1722 NCT is already working on speakers in the headliner of the car with someone. TGreg Thornton-1/28/1998
1721 How about speakers in the posts on either side of the windshield. i.e. sound thSharad Gupta-1/28/1998
1720 Lets all contribute new use ideas for flat speakers for NCTI management to consSam-1/28/1998
1719 to all, I've just been to NXT's home page nxt.co.uk (somebody tell meMichael Gollom-1/27/1998
1718 From the Feb 98 issue of Popular Science "Best of What's New " Just4Fun-1/27/1998
1717 Eve... earnings mean everything most of the time.... recently OLEX did reverse Jim Kay-1/27/1998
1716 Paul...If you had a $100M in a managed fund would you want to see two dollar stJim Kay-1/27/1998
1715 <<reverse split is never good for those holding the stock.>> I havEve Edelson-1/26/1998
1714 Not all reverses tank. true. I have not had good experiences. ATEC is a recent mark joyce-1/26/1998
1713 Jim, I don't understand why institutional investors won't buy a $2 stocPaul B. Mackey-1/26/1998
1712 Smith Corona was a reverse split. I owned 25,000 shares (on purpose!) when it Paul B. Mackey-1/26/1998
1711 1 for 2 is not a big reverse split that would allow major investors to dump.. taxikid-1/26/1998
1710 here is a small stock that is going the other way... FORD Had a reverse 1 for 2ENOTS-1/26/1998
1709 Mark... are u saying that ALL reverse splits have been negatively received??Jim Kay-1/26/1998
1708 do you have examples of companies that have 'well executed and received'mark joyce-1/26/1998
1707 IMO... if the reverse slit is done at a time the the co is profitable and does Jim Kay-1/26/1998
1706 Don't even use those words - r..... split. In my experience a reverse splitmark joyce-1/26/1998
1705 Paul... institutional investors won't buy a $2 stock... a reverse split is Jim Kay-1/26/1998
1704 Jim, We all seem to agree too many shares...but, market cap might better reflecPaul B. Mackey-1/23/1998
1703 Jean...I agree ...great technology...too many shares out... eomJim Kay-1/21/1998
1702 there are just too many shares afloat 135 mill........... I have been holding tjean1057-1/21/1998
1701Jim Kilcoyne-1/21/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News