SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17254FWIW one last point for awhile...I need an ampex break. We now, of course, know Hal Campbell-4/8/2005
17253Thanks for the links, Ramp. If I had known the letter would be forwarded, it Hal Campbell-4/8/2005
17252Here's evidence that the ITC has teeth: A judgement in favour of Eaton Corp.Rampex-4/8/2005
17251Way to go, Hal! Check out this CNET article, everybody. It seems as if every neRampex-4/8/2005
17250I sent an email to the lady who wrote that blurb, Ramp.( polite works better in Hal Campbell-4/8/2005
17249Hope it does too, OPVET. I was luckier, and had originally grabbed 22,000 sharesHal Campbell-4/8/2005
17248They're definitely going for the full court press. Obviously Kodak's PR Amboy Charlie-4/8/2005
17247Hal, It was that first BW article on KM that drew me into the fold. Sure hoOPVet-4/8/2005
17246Another BW article mentioning Ampex with disparaging tones. businessweek.com ARampex-4/8/2005
17245The ticker tonight will tell the tale.Amboy Charlie-4/8/2005
17244Tom, lets hope the old adage "there's no such thing as bad publicity&qHal Campbell-4/8/2005
17243Ampex Under Fire? Hmmm, looks like the authors omitted real facts themselves. iThomas Kirwin-4/8/2005
17242<< But if Bramson has four investment companies, all private entities, it&Hal Campbell-4/8/2005
17241from the article << While Ampex has come under fire for its aggressive puHal Campbell-4/8/2005
17240I'd like to read Countbugula's thoughts on this matter. Count, please?Rampex-4/8/2005
17239Ironic that it was a Business Week article that set off the Keepered Media specuHal Campbell-4/7/2005
17238I wonder how much time any of them actually put in running this company and how Amboy Charlie-4/7/2005
17237At the annual meeting several years ago, at the time of the reverse split, an inRampex-4/7/2005
17236Amen on the relative enormity compared to outstanding shares!OPVet-4/7/2005
17235<< They keep this option business up they'll consume everything. >&Hal Campbell-4/7/2005
17234That was not exactly a friendly article, Tom. Most likely it was planted by KodaAmboy Charlie-4/7/2005
17233I've seen lots of outrage the past few months about the top five guys gettinAmboy Charlie-4/7/2005
17232Re: Business Week Article On Ampex !!!! My comeback - There are no rules regardThomas Kirwin-4/7/2005
17231Business Week Article On Ampex !!!! by: doodlesweaver (100/M/Boneyard) 04/07/0Thomas Kirwin-4/7/2005
17230Got the word back from the accountant. They can use the tax loss carryforward Hal Campbell-4/7/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News