SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3602 25 0 ENE
Emcee:  Jorj X Mckie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1727I'm not familiar with Loral.JBTFD-2/18/2002
1726The President has always been scrutinized since Watergate. JLAjlallen-2/18/2002
1725That's fine. And while we're at it, let's look at Loral too.Bill-2/18/2002
1724In your mind it's apple and oranges. In my mind it's not. The precedenJBTFD-2/18/2002
1723I agree its pretty weak, but there are a couple more years to come up with sometJBTFD-2/18/2002
1722I had forgotten that episode. How the hell did he ever get elected in the firstjlallen-2/18/2002
1721Let's get something straight. Nobody ever had to "dig" for ClintonBill-2/18/2002
1720LOL! You are comparing apples and oranges....No hypocrisy at all... JLAjlallen-2/18/2002
1719Well, whatever you want to call it, now that it is turned on your guy dont complJBTFD-2/18/2002
1718Everybody calls him that. I call Clinton "Bubba" but don't consideBill-2/18/2002
1717Still no witchhunt..... How many convictions did the IC get? Do you have any ijlallen-2/18/2002
1716Your guys were digging for dirt for 5 or so years before she showed up.JBTFD-2/18/2002
1715I would say the first few years were a witchhunt. So now that is the precedent.JBTFD-2/18/2002
1714<I><<After the 8 year witch hunt on Clinton >></I> If aBill-2/18/2002
1713There was no witchhunt. The perjury and obstruction of justice were real. You njlallen-2/18/2002
1712What is a friend...I wont bother to parse that out. Suffice it to say it lookJBTFD-2/18/2002
1711<<You don't convict people nor smear their good names on appearances..JBTFD-2/18/2002
1710He was wrong. Or he didn't bid high enough...<g>jlallen-2/18/2002
1709Yep.jlallen-2/18/2002
1708I think many people are surprised we actually have an administration with integrBill-2/18/2002
1707Nope. You guess wrong. I believe in the rule of law foremost. That is why I sjlallen-2/18/2002
1706The difference between you and me is you choose not to believe what has not beenJBTFD-2/18/2002
1705What is a friend? It seems Ken Lay was friendly with many politicians. UnfortunaBill-2/18/2002
1704My point is that you may be proven right. Who knows? But right now, based uponjlallen-2/18/2002
1703It cuts the other way too.... JLAjlallen-2/18/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News