SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Tirex Corporation (TXMC)
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1878 15 0 TXMC
Emcee:  JohnO Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1728Try this. IMO - this is a very good company with lots of potential. finance.yahdfund-1/10/2003
1727Let the games begin............ 9:48:41 AM Trade 0.005 1000 Other OTC 9:33:jmhollen-1/10/2003
1726The page you linked to has been removed........... What was the information youjmhollen-1/10/2003
1725This looks somewhat encouraging.......: TXMC 0.03 +0.02 (+200.00%) 0 0 15,000 jmhollen-1/10/2003
1724Hey dk, Check out biz.yahoo.com. This is one company with a fantastic product. dfund-1/10/2003
1723nice to see them get all their filings in a row. We'll see what happens :)dkgross-1/9/2003
1722News is overdue based on the licensing agreement with Simpro of Italy mentioned jmhollen-1/9/2003
1721good to see ya, pal. You're right, of course. ECNC is a great reminder. Madkgross-1/6/2003
1720How much has jhollen made on his great picks - bmks, aree txmc etc. I'm justuthabros-1/6/2003
1719dk, I'm only posting here cause I consider you a stock friend,etc. The replyuthabros-1/6/2003
1718dk. com'on. How long was ECNC and the cashpad around? And the pad is still authabros-1/6/2003
1717Dear <i>Dr. Deke</i>, I presumed that you would send <i>K-9&ljmhollen-1/5/2003
1716I love Google ;) Hahaha..jm. I don't go into downtown much.dkgross-1/5/2003
1715God bless Dolby, Bose, and modern micro-electronics, aye......... Tee hee. Unljmhollen-1/5/2003
1714Dk asked: "Why bother with maintaining a website?" because maintaininMahatmabenfoo-1/5/2003
1713lol. Squelch on full :)dkgross-1/5/2003
1712Hi Dave, You should know by now that you can't get "..answers.." jmhollen-1/4/2003
1711I wonder what's in the building in Quebec now... ..who is the 'Lessor tdkgross-1/4/2003
1710---- I'm just trying to figure out why there still around ---- after 5 yearMahatmabenfoo-1/4/2003
1709I suppose I'd be mad if I had actually lost money in TXMC, but I haven'tdkgross-1/4/2003
1708== Maybe they did have someone seriously interested. Maybe == they didn't Mahatmabenfoo-1/3/2003
1707you can stop bringing up shit from 5 years ago anytime now. I don't care whdkgross-1/3/2003
1706--- MM's whacked it right back down to .005 this am MMs are not the problemMahatmabenfoo-1/3/2003
1705nice to see TXMC blow another perfect opportunity to take advantage of buying modkgross-1/3/2003
1704--- Aaa, the technology has never been the question Sigh! I called this a scaMahatmabenfoo-1/2/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):