SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Windows on Wall Street
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2233 33 0
Emcee:  Tracey R. Lanthier Jr. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1733 Sean, You are absolutely right about the WOW version 7. It is simply version Ken Adams-2/8/1999
1732 Richard, It is amazing how software developers often lose sight of the market Michael Watkins-2/8/1999
1731 When Metastock offered their RT version, users that had taken past upgrades gotRichard Estes-2/8/1999
1730 Sean, Call me stupid, but I was thinking about that very point sometime after Michael Watkins-2/8/1999
1729 Michael, MS data input is not Y2K compliant. Compuserve is dead. no indicaSean W. Smith-2/8/1999
1728 Sean, I believe that it supports Dial Data, Compuserve for direct download, plMichael Watkins-2/8/1999
1727 Michael, very true but the Upgrade has little or no value to many users. Its tSean W. Smith-2/8/1999
1726 My main complaint with WOW is that they wanted me to spend $200 (now $400) for Terry Mitchell-2/6/1999
1725 Ken or all, what are the other vendors doing? Aside from this particular softwMichael Watkins-2/5/1999
1724 All... I asked WOW tech support the direct question... "Is my version of Ken Adams-2/5/1999
1723 Richard, You are absolutely correct. The question I have is how do we get datBob Sage-2/4/1999
1722 Richard Estes: Thanks for that information...seems there is more to the story tHairBall-2/4/1999
1721 Have them explain how they are Y2K for metastock data format. Here is an post IRichard Estes-2/4/1999
1720 To All: WOW Pro 5.0 is Y2K compliant according to WOW's customer service toHairBall-2/4/1999
1719 I agree! I am looking for an alternative to WOW. any suggestions for the smalRogerC49-2/4/1999
1718 If all I've just read is true, I won't be upgrading this product, eitheKen Adams-2/4/1999
1717 They already lost me last year with their move to WOW Internet Trader and theirTerry Mitchell-2/4/1999
1716 Consider them "hurt" here if this is true! Judy-2/4/1999
1715 The word I hear is WOW is not going to fix the Y2k on any past versions. This tRichard Estes-2/4/1999
1714 Hi, sorry I can't answer that, but have a question out there for anyone usiAugustWest-1/31/1999
1713 To all, does anyone have a particular formula to use as a system or indicator tTondon-1/30/1999
1712 Wilson, Can you tell me about WOW Pro ver. 5.0.32.06 and Y2K ? I use Quotes PBob Sage-1/29/1999
1711 Peter, E-mail me privately with the file and I will see if I can help. Harold Harold Lanier-1/28/1999
1710 Michael- email me at wmeador@wallstreet.net with a more complete description ofdunlurkin-1/27/1999
1709 I have DJIA data all the way back to Jan 1, 1900. I was trying to import it toPeterS-1/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):