SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17354River's $ 100 million in revs each year is very close to the model I am refiSwamp Fox-4/28/2005
17353Thanks a Lots digger, Very informative and very funny. DrDDrD-4/28/2005
17352Dr. FWIW 'Googled that five dollar word and found this: <i>ESTOPPEL digger-4/28/2005
17351Hal, you're quite correct about their response. It was over fifty pages longDrD-4/28/2005
17350Both Altek and Kodak responses are virtually identical to their initial complainHal Campbell-4/28/2005
17349There's a recently filed amended response to the complaint against Kodak froAmboy Charlie-4/28/2005
17348I plan on calling in sick, jump on the train in Trenton and attend the annual meThomas Kirwin-4/28/2005
17347I'll be there as well. We should put all of the boards questions together schriscraft-4/27/2005
17346Hal, Thanks for sharing your info on form 4,s I'd be happy to try to get digger-4/27/2005
17345The 4s referred to some minor old option exercises. Nothing that would bear on tHal Campbell-4/27/2005
17344You got me , Bill. Every time I write a positive post , I'm selling. Every tHal Campbell-4/27/2005
17343All right, who just dumped 30,000 shares?! Was that you Hal? Billwlcnyc-4/27/2005
17342Look forward to you report, Mark. (and photos! <g>)Hal Campbell-4/27/2005
17341ya know I think the major flaw in my numbers is probably this. Ampex patents Hal Campbell-4/27/2005
17340The key number, Charlie, is the long term debt. They knocked that down to a littHal Campbell-4/27/2005
17339thxPaul Lee-4/27/2005
17338Thanks Hal, I think I'll pass on the Peninsula, Looks like the Petite queendigger-4/27/2005
17337From the look of the balance sheet we're still about 100 million in the holeAmboy Charlie-4/27/2005
17336PERIOD ENDING 31-Dec-04 30-Sep-04 30-Jun-04 31-Mar-04 Total Revenue 74,327 8,3Amboy Charlie-4/27/2005
17335For Kodak, Paul wilmerhale.com For Ampex adduci.com also ropesgray.com spHal Campbell-4/27/2005
17334Do you have the names of the attorneys (their firms) for each side? thxPaul Lee-4/26/2005
17333The Attorneys for both Ampex and Kodak must be really going at each other. The aDrD-4/26/2005
17332What did you post that for? It's ages old and the information is available tAmboy Charlie-4/26/2005
17331aplf.orgthemoniesgone-4/26/2005
17330<< right around the corner from my dentist >> as you know Bill, getHal Campbell-4/26/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News