SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17379At this rate, Hal, it could be back to single digits well before the ITC decisioAmboy Charlie-5/3/2005
17378I tend to agree, Charlie. So many well established potential news items that &quHal Campbell-5/3/2005
17377Don't assume someone had inside knowledge, Dave. The way this stock has beenAmboy Charlie-5/3/2005
17376Thanks Paul! Hal: Funny how someone knew about this on friday and bought theDave Heibeck-5/2/2005
17375Thanks Paul. The Ampex market has been and is very much in the <i>buytherHal Campbell-5/2/2005
17374Ampex Corporation Files Listing Application with Nasdaq National Market Monday MPaul Lee-5/2/2005
17373Interesting, Ramp.Thanks. And the Baristas are patent attorneys.Hal Campbell-5/2/2005
17372I've not read the Fool article but, here is someone's rebuttal posted onRampex-5/2/2005
17371Yes, attitude,confidence and HOW Ed will say things are extremely important. We chriscraft-4/30/2005
17370No, Can't attend Chris. Look forward to reports. Not so much for informationHal Campbell-4/29/2005
17369Yup, I thought you would like that, I / We like seeing larger block trades 10k, chriscraft-4/29/2005
17368Nice Friday finish, Chris.Hal Campbell-4/29/2005
17367<< virtually low/no debt/liabilities >> I agree it is a value here,Hal Campbell-4/29/2005
17366You would have to think once others are exposed to Ampex, with their current numchriscraft-4/29/2005
17365Think I know what you mean,Ramp. Good vent. The market cap for ampex is mightHal Campbell-4/29/2005
17364AMPEX CORPORATION - PROXY STATEMENT (April 29, 2005) sec.gov Note - The above Thomas Kirwin-4/29/2005
17363I appreciate the efforts of all you guys in trying to guess numbers for Our CompRampex-4/29/2005
17362And I don't mind seeing the price go down because I want to buy a bunch moreAmboy Charlie-4/29/2005
17361We need some more settlements, especially in other areas to get the stock fired chriscraft-4/29/2005
17360Obviously I am biased, but it's a pity that an American company is challengiHal Campbell-4/28/2005
17359River, everytime I think I got the "numbers" Ed keeps adding "basSwamp Fox-4/28/2005
17358Please post your thoughts when da refining is done, Charlie ( must be somethingHal Campbell-4/28/2005
17357You are most welcome, Charlie.Hal Campbell-4/28/2005
17356<< I even saw that dreaded word "estoppel" used by Kodak. ShadesHal Campbell-4/28/2005
17355Thanks, Hal. I waited half an hour last night for the last kilobyte and it just Amboy Charlie-4/28/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):