SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
CLL oilsands play
An SI Board Since March 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
549 32 0 CLL
Emcee:  james flannigan Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
174I contacted RG from CLL on Friday.He intends not to issue any more shares of CLLjames flannigan-10/24/2009
173Connacher Oil and Gas Limited provides Algar update Connacher Oil and Gas LimitWayne Whalen-10/23/2009
172Hey, 7M shares traded and were up a penny ...Wayne Whalen-10/15/2009
171Well, Gusella's "good Effect" has CLL down 4 cents on 3.5M traded Wayne Whalen-10/15/2009
170After you buy the whole company get rid of Gusella ....Wayne Whalen-10/15/2009
169The level of retail shareholder anger is high on all other chat boards includingjames flannigan110/15/2009
168When we get a low ball hostile bid we will take the offer and CLL and Gusella wiWayne Whalen-10/15/2009
167"good effect" must be the 99 cent valuation. WayneWayne Whalen-10/15/2009
166CLLs shareholder situation is grim.First if the largest shareholder of CLL is sejames flannigan-10/15/2009
165LOL, whatever the good effect was, it had no effect on us. I was out of CLL fortom pope-10/15/2009
164Hi Tom: Do you know what the "good effect" is that he mentioned? WaynWayne Whalen-10/15/2009
163Thanks. What arrogance! EDIT - the idiot doesn't even know what "fulsotom pope-10/14/2009
162Just a couple of email replies from Richard Gusella explains why no one wants anWayne Whalen210/14/2009
161I have heard that Richard Gusella was an arrogant snob but it took a couple of eWayne Whalen110/14/2009
160Fair enough... That discussion got real old. And I am still up to my butt in CMetacomet-10/14/2009
159It's going very well. Thank you for asking. PBG now has a NAV of somewhere kidl-10/14/2009
158Good. It really gets old hearing how smart you guys that bought into that fire Metacomet-10/14/2009
157Us PBG "clowns" are up very nicely which all that counts BUT you are rkidl-10/14/2009
156<i>It's a dead horse. Why beat it?</i> Good question... And yeMetacomet-10/14/2009
155It's a dead horse. Why beat it?kidl-10/14/2009
154If they do maybe Gusella will take one ... on that news the stock would probablyWayne Whalen-10/14/2009
153NICE CLL CHART 2005 $1 2010 (almost) $1 .That pretty much says it all. Viewers james flannigan-10/14/2009
152DAMIT I spoke too soon oil is up $10 bucks in the past week and CLL is down a pejames flannigan-10/14/2009
151Doesn't CLL have a poison pill? I think so.Condor-10/14/2009
150Ya, and when we get that low ball bid and we take our dollar a share then GusellWayne Whalen-10/14/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):