SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99 | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99

An SI Board Since July 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2340	25	0

Emcee: David Lawrence	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1740	<i>"Who's in charge of this circus anyhow."</i> circ	mr.mark	-	8/12/1999
1739	Thanks Tom I wonder why they go directly to the trash folder. Is there a setti	Sidney Reilly	-	8/12/1999
1738	Look in the thrash folder. It took me a little while to find them as well. Reg	Tom C	-	8/12/1999
1737	Who's in charge of this circus anyhow. None of my in messages are being sto	Sidney Reilly	-	8/12/1999
1736	Hey BryanB or anyone I need the ticker at the bottom of SI running to keep AOL	levy	-	8/12/1999
1735	Chill Dood, I'm sorry. Glad to have you on board with us Classic Folks B	Cheeky Kid	-	8/12/1999
1734	I did not say that <b>	Graystone	-	8/11/1999
1733	<i>"There are users that were here when the beta was initially rolle	Paul K	-	8/11/1999
1732	hi michael, re <i>"The most loyal customers are the most likely one	mr.mark	-	8/11/1999
1731	Bryan, PMJI, but the reason many of us want the old SI is because of BrowseMast	DownSouth	-	8/11/1999
1730	That is reassuring, Bryan. I never looked at the "Bull and Bear" surv	jbe	-	8/11/1999
1729	Another oddity. When responding to a message in the inbox, whether private or	Carolyn	-	8/11/1999
1728	Adding new features from the beta version such as viewing 10 messages at a time	V.	-	8/11/1999
1727	I know, but I couldn't resist. <g>	Carolyn	-	8/11/1999
1726	Chistopher, Yes, when you find another example, please PM it to me. Thanks,	BryanB	-	8/11/1999
1725	AugustWest: <i>I wonder if that means we will have to comprimise and get	BryanB	-	8/11/1999
1724	Please add "search this thread only" option to the searcher at the b	Mighty_Mezz	-	8/11/1999
1723	That's correct. But when you say "When you click on that link	The Philosopher	-	8/11/1999
1722	<i>Thanks. I saw that, but thought it might be an attempt to tame the sav	BryanB	-	8/11/1999
1721	Joan, I don't think that any "key" features will be missing, but	BryanB	-	8/11/1999
1720	Christopher: <i>I can't reply to those messages without signing into	BryanB	-	8/11/1999
1719	CatLady, The new site will be screamin' quick, long before the old SI goes	BryanB	-	8/11/1999
1718	I use www.exchange2000.com. Could that be the problem? Tom	Tom C	-	8/11/1999
1717	<i>Using the short form of the link i.e. #Subject-14747 is fine for Class	RTev	-	8/11/1999
1716	CatLady, Using the short form of the link i.e. #Subject-14747 is fine for Clas	Tom C	-	8/11/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):