SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU)
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
18444 7 0 ZULUD
Emcee:  I Am John Galt Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17419 CWIII, the question you cited asks "what are some of the current revenue pJon Tara-12/30/1998
17418 Brady, I read the latest PR and assume the same thoughts as yours. However; tBagladdy-12/30/1998
17417 Brady, That's the way I always understood it be per the last ZULU PR. cwiCWIII-12/29/1998
17416 Okay, I just reread the last PR concerning the reverse split and merger. excerBrady B.-12/29/1998
17415 Party: I figure you are going to reply to the previous response by saying Mr. Brady B.-12/29/1998
17414 There's a couple of things in his reply that tells me the questions will neBrady B.-12/29/1998
17413 no, JT is interested in creating balance to all the 'hype' posted here.Fredman-12/29/1998
17412 It sure freakin seems that way!!!!! eomCWIII-12/29/1998
17411 Clifton, The work you and others have done is appreciated by most people I'aleta-12/29/1998
17410 Unfortunately, Cliff, Jon Tara is only interested in creating mischief. You PartyTime-12/29/1998
17409 Jon, Here is another challenge for you and others!!!!! I did it will any of yoCWIII-12/29/1998
17408 Jon, This is an excerpt from the fax: "<b>Financial:</b> 1CWIII-12/29/1998
17407 "The bottom line for me is can this venture become profitable!!!!!" Jon Tara-12/29/1998
17406 Jon, It's been almost four hours later and still no objections!!!! So whatCWIII-12/29/1998
17405 PT, you said on YooHoo: "Plus, he sent in all of the questions instead ofJon Tara-12/29/1998
17404 CWIII, you first listed your proposed edits to the questions at Tuesday, Dec 29Jon Tara-12/29/1998
17403 Jon, You sir are an idiot and need to get a life!!!!!! I posted the question tCWIII-12/29/1998
17402 Jon, I guess it is good to finally see you communicating with the company. WhaPartyTime-12/29/1998
17401 >>>Of course, PT will somehow argue that it's an affront to the coPartyTime-12/29/1998
17400 No, Jon. I don't question your competence to do things; only your objectivPartyTime-12/29/1998
17399 "I just didn't want our effort to become a hodge-podge endeavor filledJon Tara-12/29/1998
17398 No, Brady. I would not have taken the time to describe an example of where shaPartyTime-12/29/1998
17397 What "other set of questions", Terry? There aren't two sets of qJon Tara-12/29/1998
17396 Jon Tara, your fax to Pat Hayton was, in my humble opinion, unreasonably and uTerry T.-12/29/1998
17395 To: Pat Hayton FAX: 760-564-5401 From: Jon Tara FAX: XXX-XXX-XXXX You maJon Tara-12/29/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):