SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17679 72 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Gus Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17429Hal: Don't the little guys/Tax payers always take in in the Arse? On TopicDave Heibeck-5/13/2005
17428As an ironic aside, Dave. The savings and loan crisis in the early nineties....tHal Campbell-5/12/2005
17427Chris: Thanks... I couldn't agree more! I have always wished that Ed was mDave Heibeck-5/12/2005
17426Hal: "United bails on employee pensions (so only 70% will be covered by thDave Heibeck-5/12/2005
17425Dave, you are correct in your thinking. It's a combination of things right chriscraft-5/11/2005
17424A Nasdaq listing should help in the long run, Dave. I agree. Personally I canHal Campbell-5/11/2005
17423Hal: You know, I've convinced myself that the problem is much more about beDave Heibeck-5/11/2005
17422Ampex will probably earn at least 5 bucks a share this year. The average marketHal Campbell-5/11/2005
17421Was joking , of course, Paul, but if Kodak should settle one of these days, a coHal Campbell-5/11/2005
17420All the greats retire often .. Sugar Ray Leonard and Michael Jordan to name justHal Campbell-5/11/2005
17419I told you the pressure would get to you, but you wished it, so you got it. goPaul Lee-5/11/2005
17418No, no, no.....don't go! You have the well deserved title - keep it. Bilwlcnyc-5/11/2005
17417Paul: I might have to stop using SI if this were to happen! I've been hereDave Heibeck-5/11/2005
17416However, Paul only beat me by "seconds" - before I hit submit, I checkPaul Lee-5/10/2005
17415Ampex Should Not Be Saddled With Pension Liabilities Judge Approves End of UnitThomas Kirwin-5/10/2005
17414LOL! However, Paul only beat me by "seconds" - before I hit submit, Iwlcnyc-5/10/2005
17413In the current issue of Business Week magazine, there is an article describing VDrD-5/10/2005
17412Paul,just a guess, butI think he would probably carefully consider it before sayHal Campbell-5/10/2005
17411Do you think Ed would ever consider a conferencce call ? :)Paul Lee-5/10/2005
17410Thanks as always, Paul (Bill your request that Paul be tested for steroids has bHal Campbell-5/10/2005
17409I am very encouraged by the following statements from the earnings release: <SanDiegoInvestor-5/10/2005
17408The numbers look blockbuster to me, it only gets better from here. How about a fchriscraft-5/10/2005
17407Ampex Corporation Reports First Quarter 2005 Financial Results ----------------Paul Lee-5/10/2005
17406And may it continue to stretch back a while. I don't have nearly enough of iAmboy Charlie-5/10/2005
17405Like stretching the rubber back on my sling shot as a kid, this stock will be stSwamp Fox-5/10/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):