Nasdaq planning clampdown on Internet rumours

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Nasdaq planning clampdown on Internet rumours

An SI Board Since September 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
250	6	0

Emcee: Done, gone.	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
175	It makes you laugh when institutions with a license to steal start taking steps	Postman	-	9/8/1997
174	De<b>f</b>initely ;^) (end)	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	9/8/1997
173	Jeff, >> In the ecosystem of SI, as in life, it aint good to fool with	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
172	Jeff, >> You established this thread to stress how important the free f	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
171	I hope this is more than an experimental ecosystem. For we are all contributing	Andy Chen	-	9/8/1997
170	Mark, anyone who has been on SI for at least several months has probably encoun	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	9/8/1997
169	Bill, I agree with you that just because the yelling of obscenities may be cons	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	9/8/1997
168	You established this thread to stress how important the free flow of informatio	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	9/8/1997
167	Andy, I am responding to you one last time, only to clarify matters. You stat	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
166	Bounced Czech, guess I was wrong. <eom> Ice	Iceberg	-	9/8/1997
165	Iceberg, >> My understanding is that the threat of physical harm is not	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
164	Bill, Thank you for the courtesy of your response. May our paths cross again	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
163	>With the one obvius exception of the threat of physical harm, I see no reas	Iceberg	-	9/8/1997
162	Michal, I've already left. I'm responding to your message out of courte	Bill Ulrich	-	9/8/1997
161	Bill, I urge you to calmly and deeply reconsider not only your actions regardi	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
160	Fair enough Michal, I personally do not see any point in continued participatio	Bill Ulrich	-	9/8/1997
159	Bill, Thank you for your concern, and for e-mailing me directly with the conte	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
158	This topic was just posted in the IFC at techstocks.com Just wanted to let eve	Mark Johnson	-	9/8/1997
157	ITS REAL SIMPLE. LET NASDAQ POST IF ONE OF THEIR COMPANIES ARE INVOLVED AND THE	Michael Markham	-	9/8/1997
156	>> there you go, playing around with words. << Andy, Call it wh	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
155	<i> So, if it makes you nervous, don't buy Nasdaq stocks. </i>	Andy Chen	-	9/8/1997
154	>> better yet, just don't buy stocks. refuse to buy stocks. <<	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
153	>> If you don't buy Nadaq stocks, NASD will not chave any justificat	Done, gone.	-	9/8/1997
152	>> However, how can a computer program determine which web pages contain	smolejv@gmx.net	-	9/8/1997
151	<i>Who are the financial community? Arent we the largest part of it? I do	Andy Chen	-	9/8/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):