SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19331 48 0 DCTC
Emcee:  Bruce Galpeer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17531 Touche' Don. Of course all of us coming out of it too wouldn't be bad Parker Benchley-8/22/1999
17530 You might be right about the future of DCTC Mr. Peaceful- what a name.... Heredon denson-8/21/1999
17529 >> No value has been placed on the SmartFax shares and no revenue or profKen Salaets-8/21/1999
17528 Wow Barb, I am beyond words here. You surprised me and I would not expect you tDayTraderKidd-8/21/1999
17527 Dear Timbo, Thanks for the clarification. Good luck with the Steelers this yearDe Peepster-8/21/1999
17526 Dear Craig, Read this post for a brief summary: Message 10991558 Then read theDe Peepster-8/21/1999
17525 Lazeybones, Thanks for the honor of allowing me to respond without fear of havernie de la fuente-8/20/1999
17524 Can someone tell me what is going on with this company? I sold my shares at jusDayTraderKidd-8/20/1999
17523 Ernie...I must say that you possess... ...a most singular lack of substance inLaserbones-8/20/1999
17522 There is no joy in Mudville. (Due, in park, to bat attitudes, and foul languisdch-8/20/1999
17521 Dear Pee Pee, I never understand any of your posts. Not one. All them goofyTimbo-8/20/1999
17520 Lazeybones, Presenting "balance" in a pretentious manner is annoyingernie de la fuente-8/20/1999
17519 Dear Ken Last thing this is too freeking bloody, will read rest later ;(: On JuDe Peepster-8/20/1999
17518 Dear Ken, Well here is the skinny on the Cyberfax deal: In June 1999, with theDe Peepster-8/20/1999
17517 Report filed: freeedgar.com De Peepster-8/20/1999
17516 Good find, Ernie. Very revealing. Interesting "action" yesterday. IKen Salaets-8/20/1999
17515 Ernie... ...do you understand what has actually been happening in our dialogueLaserbones-8/20/1999
17514 Baldwin...there's no gun to your head. <EOM>Laserbones-8/20/1999
17513 I believe you just used ALL of those abbreviations (G, BG, VBG, VBFG) in a contBaldwin-8/20/1999
17512 Dear Don,( OT at this point) For clarifications sake it occurred to me ( which De Peepster-8/20/1999
17511 Dear LB, " but is the question merely one of venue or is the issue totallyDe Peepster-8/20/1999
17510 <i> Is this thread nothing more than a purgatory for DCI ShareholdersParker Benchley-8/20/1999
17509 <i>t seems to me that one simple reason there is so much heated yet non-cParker Benchley-8/20/1999
17508 ....and your use of sarcasm excuses your inability to refrain from coming acrosernie de la fuente-8/20/1999
17507 I think you need to review common usage tags... ...<G> at the end of a sLaserbones-8/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):