SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GGNS Genus
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2006 27 0 GGNS
Emcee:  Ziad Hatab Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1756Well Bob...you just might get the chance... m1mahler_one-8/8/2003
1755You've got the idea.GG Bobrobert b furman-8/6/2003
1754Thanks Bob...I already picked some up in the low $2 range, and think that my posmahler_one-8/6/2003
1753Well Unless we get a surprise rally off the 50 day moving averages(on the sox anrobert b furman-8/6/2003
1752Do you think all of the damage has been done Robert? m1mahler_one-8/6/2003
1751Hi M1, Been a rock so far today - looks good to me. Bobrobert b furman-8/6/2003
1750Yes Bob...you just,unfortunately,might. Hard to fully express how bad a job I tmahler_one-8/5/2003
1749Hi Mahler, I was a player at 2.40 but it never got there. May have that opportrobert b furman-8/5/2003
1748Hi Bob...thinking of buying under $2.50? $2.00?mahler_one-8/5/2003
1747The response to Mr. Elder and his presentation is painfully obvious. Of course, mahler_one-7/31/2003
1746I suppose the most logical candidate would be the party from whom GGNS just won mahler_one-7/30/2003
1745I don't think there is any change. It is a third layer small player that harobert b furman-7/30/2003
1744What's so different about the company after this latest release? When the seLuce Wildebeest-7/30/2003
1743Hi M1, That's not a bad thought. Who would be potential players?? Bobrobert b furman-7/30/2003
1742Marty and Bob: I suppose the public has voted with their pocket-books. Not muchmahler_one-7/29/2003
1741So far, much less then enthusiastic response to the release. Hope something reamahler_one-7/29/2003
1740Thanks...after the conference call we might have an answer as to why they sold smahler_one-7/28/2003
1739The Chairman about May 14th and the VP on May 27thNumberspro-7/28/2003
1738Wider loss then expected on increased sales. Cost of sales evidently much highemahler_one-7/28/2003
1737Hi Bob, I honestly feel that options can be a very good thing as it tends to aliNumberspro-7/26/2003
1736HI Numberspro, I think that this OPTIONS B.S. has got to come to an end. It perobert b furman-7/26/2003
1735Started looking into the company and was a little disturbed by the sales by the Numberspro-7/25/2003
1734Thanks Bob...no warning in the announcement of the cc in a few weeks. m1mahler_one-7/22/2003
1733HI M1, Scottrade shows a high of 3.44 - their data feed is often corrupt howeverobert b furman-7/22/2003
1732Hey Robert...think the $3.99 is valid? Something happened in the last half hourmahler_one-7/21/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):