SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Westrend Natural Gas - I.D.E. Hot Stock
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2011 13 0
Emcee:  Infodine Systems Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1761 The following is a direct quote from a private message I received, I felt it apLeigh McBain-12/14/1998
1760 At least we have one bright light on this thread! Thanks Leigh, Chuckr Chuck Rubin-12/14/1998
1759 Hello Gentlemen, I wish this was moving in a different direction as well. RichLeigh McBain-12/14/1998
1758 Although I too have been watching this stock for a couple of years now, I feel Kevin Underwood-12/12/1998
1757 <<This part of the circular has NO bearing on intent for dilution whatsoeWink-12/11/1998
1756 Sale of Undertaking The shareholders are being asked, in accordance with the rGene Veinotte-12/11/1998
1755 WESTREND NATURAL GAS INC. 4100 Piedras Drive East, Suite 205 San Antonio, TGene Veinotte-12/11/1998
1754 Proxy details: 1 AFFIX LABEL HERE PROXY SOLICITED BY MANAGEMENT WESTREND NGene Veinotte-12/11/1998
1753 My pleasure Chuck, it has been nice to see some of the people out there, I knowLeigh McBain-12/11/1998
1752 Thanks for the clarification Leigh and Startup. Chuckr Chuck Rubin-12/11/1998
1751 Chuck et al. - NO it does not mean a 5:1 consolidation, if you multiply 6,666,6Leigh McBain-12/11/1998
1750 just quoting proxy circular...don't really know myself how many shares therjust starting-12/11/1998
1749 Sounds like a license to dilute to me! <eom> ;>) Wink-12/11/1998
1748 Since there are not 100-mil outstanding that would mean a 1 for 5 reverse, woulChuck Rubin-12/11/1998
1747 circular states "up to fifteen (15) current common shares for one (1)"just starting-12/11/1998
1746 One thing we all have to keep in mind, is that the primary goal for the companyLeigh McBain-12/11/1998
1745 No Leigh, I am only going on what I hear here on the thread, I haven't gotChuck Rubin-12/11/1998
1744 Chuck, do you have the circular with you at the moment, I don't, forgot itLeigh McBain-12/11/1998
1743 The number of shares Westrend has out now is not tremendous...so I don't reChuck Rubin-12/11/1998
1742 Chuck, as I posted I do not support a 15:1 ratio, not now, not later, not likeLeigh McBain-12/11/1998
1741 I feel such a humongous reverse is really a slap in current investors faces....Chuck Rubin-12/11/1998
1740 Who cares what they do as long as they do something. At $.10 a share I would raJeff-12/11/1998
1739 I am strictly against it. The price has drifted downward due to management'Wink-12/11/1998
1738 Leigh, If there isn't a real good reason and momentum of the share price keChuck Rubin-12/10/1998
1737 Chuck, I am almost always against consolidations too, however, at the moment ILeigh McBain-12/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News