SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Exodus Communications, Inc. (EXDS)
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3664 81 0 EXDS
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1764 "Equity: Common Stock $.0005 Par, 12/99, 300M auth., 170,452,310 issd. InsDitchdigger-1/16/2000
1763 Quick question.... Was Wit Capital one of the original underwriters of the IPOztect-1/16/2000
1762 Is this the link from Frank C.'s thread? Message 11497222Original Mad Dog-1/16/2000
1761 Somewhere on Frank C's thread is a report of RFP's submitted to at leaPruguy-1/16/2000
1760 -OT- Pruguy, re: <i>"long isld, long exds"</i> I onceFrank A. Coluccio-1/16/2000
1759 ........................................................... Remember, the numbeDOUG H-1/16/2000
1758 The "How difficult is it to start a data center" argument reminds me Original Mad Dog-1/16/2000
1757 <<<<Again, would you invest $77 to a business that sells $1 of gooDOUG H-1/15/2000
1756 RE: "How difficult is it to start a data center?" This is the same tRupert-1/15/2000
1755 People go where people go! Can any accounting firm do an audit? why is there thZoro-1/15/2000
1754 please post article if possible Pruguy-1/15/2000
1753 I have no personal experience here, but by the looks of the progress others arePruguy-1/15/2000
1752 EXDS mentioned as a recommendation to overweight in your portfolio, by Lehman BOriginal Mad Dog-1/15/2000
1751 I simply gave an example that's easy to understand. Again, would you investpass pass-1/15/2000
1750 your argument is much to simple to be taken seriously....just as an example , nPruguy-1/15/2000
1749 There is no billion dollar company on the planet that commands a P/S ratio of 7pass pass-1/15/2000
1748 Ed.. It would appear that your analysis is sillier. I notice this is your firsPhantomTrader-1/14/2000
1747 C'mon guys, is this noise really necessary? This company has everything goZoro-1/14/2000
1746 >>Not worth a dime. You make an assumption that the store is debt free, Ed Schultz-1/14/2000
1745 <<From my brother RE silly numbers:>> Under your scenario (P/E reiDOUG H-1/14/2000
1744 From my brother RE silly numbers: Interesting, but totally silly arithmetic. Ed Schultz-1/14/2000
1743 Thanks for the insight to you and Dale.. this analysis came from the Raging BulPhantomTrader-1/14/2000
1742 If you do it for baby when they reach 70 well it's LOL... last year I diBoplicity-1/14/2000
1741 <i>ans. in 40 years you would have 22 billions dollars. at 10% it is onlyDave B-1/14/2000
1740 ans. in 40 years you would have 22 billions dollars. at 10% it is only $90k, 20Boplicity-1/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):