Imclone systems (IMCL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2515	89	0	IMCL

Emcee: Deeber	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1765	I listened to the CC. The statement that seemed most telling went something lik	IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL	-	12/31/2001
1764	There's some discussion of IMCL on Peter Suzman's Biotech Valuation thre	RCMac	-	12/31/2001
1763	Why not investigate the FDA? Somebody leaked the info. That's the place to	613	-	12/31/2001
1762	I knew that Dirks was eventually vindicated, but I thought that the Supreme Cour	tom pope	-	12/31/2001
1761	<i>if you have material information that you have reason to believe came t	RCMac	-	12/30/2001
1760	another message messages.clubs.yahoo.com	Les H	-	12/30/2001
1759	Ray Dirks won the protracted legal battle. The case was also quit different. H	aknahow	-	12/30/2001
1758	I'm clearly not a lawyer either, but I believe that if you have material inf	tom pope	-	12/30/2001
1757	my final comment on the legality or illegality involved . I I buy IMCL on the b	aknahow	-	12/30/2001
1756	I am obviously not a lawyer. but to have inside information is not in any way i	aknahow	-	12/30/2001
1755	<i> Not sure it violates the securities laws. </i> He tells us that	RCMac	-	12/30/2001
1754	You might want to read this article as it explains apparently what has happened.	Arthur Radley	-	12/30/2001
1753	<i>Of course, there should be an SEC investigation too but that will never	tom pope	-	12/30/2001
1752	Very disappointing. What does working closely with the FDA mean if this happens	613	-	12/30/2001
1751	What does this mean? Is it possible that the FDA notified the company of this af	Madharry	-	12/30/2001
1750	deleted	quidditch	-	12/29/2001
1749	A cordial invitation to the 2002 biotech stock contest: Subject 52126 The conte	Mike McFarland	-	12/29/2001
1748	Not sure it violates the securities laws. He/she has made public the informatio	aknahow	-	12/29/2001
1747	This one is going to hurt a bit. And I'm afraid there goes my chance at bea	keokalani'nui	-	12/29/2001
1746	The Yahoo post includes this important assertion: <i>While I can't rev	RCMac	-	12/29/2001
1745	I'm thinking I will put on a position if it sells off Monday. Would you advi	Elmer	-	12/29/2001
1744	FWIW, here's a post on Yahoo that explains what happened. Of we have no ide	caly	-	12/29/2001
1743	Rumor? When sucker, ML, speak listen carefully. They have spies everywhere. Mi	Miljenko Zuanic	-	12/28/2001
1742	from realmoney: Adam Feuerstein 8:03 PM ET Unbelievable! The FDA rejected Imc	HiSpeed	-	12/28/2001
1741	Was this company's drug unanimously approved by the FDA's advisory commi	Elmer	-	12/28/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):