Gliatech (GLIA) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Gliatech (GLIA)

An SI Board Since November 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2001	20	0	GLIA

Emcee: scaram(o)uche	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1776	I think you are close on this one John. I read the panel discussion again. fda	Joe Wesley	-	9/2/2000
1775	This is Monday morning quarterbacking. Things like this do happen, especially	RWReeves	-	9/1/2000
1774	<<This is the first time that I've seen it alleged as to who made the	NeuroInvestment	-	9/1/2000
1773	GLIA story in NY Times: nytimes.com I am mully over buying some here. The risk	phbolton	-	9/1/2000
1772	Dr. John is long too - Message 14311088 I'm staying in too, if only out of a	nigel bates	-	9/1/2000
1771	John, that's a pretty aggressive reading of the GLIA situation. I would hone	RWReeves	-	9/1/2000
1770	AMEN, Amen, Bill Tomko	Bill Tomko	-	9/1/2000
1769	Message 13319293	scaram(o)uche	-	9/1/2000
1768	Sept. 1 /PRNewswire/ -- Gliatech Inc. (Nasdaq: GLIA - news) today announced the	nigel bates	-	9/1/2000
1767	We are on the road to recovery with this Am's press release. There is nothin	Bill Tomko	-	9/1/2000
1766	Here's another story on the Form 4483 fiasco. infobeat.com There are two i	Dr. John M. de Castro	-	9/1/2000
1765	nicotine is not addictive Glia is run by saints Stephens & Co's analyst	Ben Wa	-	9/1/2000
1764	<<Any thoughts on why the bulk of todays volume appears as one massive tra	tnsaf	-	8/31/2000
1763	The real issue with the FDA when considering approval was the ability to relate	Bill Tomko	-	8/31/2000
1762	John, Well someone else I know bought some calls today, so you are not <i>	Biomaven	-	8/31/2000
1761	Here's another interpretation for you. GLIA and the FDA went round and round	Dr. John M. de Castro	-	8/31/2000
1760	If you read my post carefully, you'll see I say simply that it is <i>p	Biomaven	-	8/31/2000
1759	perhaps I am misunderstanding something but the question to me is not who did th	Madharry	-	8/31/2000
1758	So now we have a little more detail. 1. The reading was apparently by an "	Biomaven	-	8/31/2000
1757	Glia seems to be moving up to 9 on island.	kech	-	8/31/2000
1756	What choice do they have? how on earh does this company survive if Adcon gets re	Madharry	-	8/31/2000
1755	More from the Cleveland Plain Dealer on the FDA Form 483 fiasco. cleveland.com	Dr. John M. de Castro	-	8/31/2000
1754	If you believe that glia had not acted in good faith in negotiating the deal - t	Ben Wa	-	8/30/2000
1753	More likely reason is GLFD would refuse to pay and GLIA would be looking at year	Bill Tomko	-	8/30/2000
1752	Why did GLIA let GLFD back out of the deal without penalty? "Earlier, Stac	Dr. John M. de Castro	-	8/30/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):