SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
OILEX (OLEX)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4276 3 0 OLEX
Emcee:  Eric Maggard Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1776 Who is a net seller? He(they) is doing pretty good lately (400k Wed.) one shot.A Kor-11/27/1997
1775 Thx to Baron for a big effort. Keep it coming. Time to make money people,,, OLESteve-11/27/1997
1774 B, Guilty only to #1 (insomniac). Back to business for a sec (thoough I find tJohn Rowe-11/27/1997
1773 On the lighter side:.... What do you get when you cross an Insomniac, a DislexBrezlin-11/27/1997
1772 You guys are doing a poor job. I cannot understand why with all the negative poMarty Rubin-11/26/1997
1771 Scott- I take no offence or negative intentions to your post at all, thanks- I Larry Sallee-11/26/1997
1770 A good Thanksgiving to all of you! Offie EOMOFW-11/26/1997
1769 Baron, I got so hot I forgot to add, I was serious when I mentioned that if theScott H. Davis-11/26/1997
1768 Baron, I was not suggesting you were shorting (that would be presumptious and rScott H. Davis-11/26/1997
1767 Larry, Yes it showed increased revenue. And Offie (Steve) is right, very littlScott H. Davis-11/26/1997
1766 Thanks for your cooler head comments Jeff- I hope we will remember not to expecLarry Sallee-11/26/1997
1765 To Scott H. Davis, You asked us to correct you if you were wrong. OK, no wherebaron-marney-11/26/1997
1764 To All, RE: our statement "We are not going to point any fingers but it lbaron-marney-11/26/1997
1763 Jamess, With this highly volital age...even a slight over/under calculation loJeffry Rogers McCall-11/26/1997
1762 I think Scott meant &*##$)&% ! instead of &*#$)&%. Certainly nBrezlin-11/26/1997
1761 Another thing that we need to look at is the possible increase in shares. SincEric Maggard-11/26/1997
1760 Baron, I sincerely appreciate your efforts to aid in communication. I DO NOT, hScott H. Davis-11/26/1997
1759 Baron: We appreciate your post and the company's willingness to tell us whOFW-11/26/1997
1758 <i>A good company, good management, and good projects should be the focusEric Maggard-11/26/1997
1757 To All, Just spoke with Company, what we have is another case of half informatbaron-marney-11/26/1997
1756 Correction to Error in Previous Post: Due to an error on my part, the date &quOFW-11/26/1997
1755 EXACTLY WHICH OILEX LAWSUIT ARE WE DISCUSSING? Oilex, Inc., Baron-Marney, LarrOFW-11/26/1997
1754 happy thanksgiving just wanted to let everyone know i sent an email to omar on jamess-11/26/1997
1753 THE COMPANY RESPONSE AS RECEIVED BY OFFIE In the interest of keeping all past OFW-11/26/1997
1752 I agree with you mad. There are so many questions about this company that I amEric Maggard-11/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News