SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1790thank you.Elmer-1/6/2002
1789Many things. Do you believe there are no problems, even small ones? Miljenko eMiljenko Zuanic-1/4/2002
1788David, Anti-EGF approach (as monotherapy and in combination) does work. So doesMiljenko Zuanic-1/4/2002
1787Not to answer for Miljenko, but there are some SI posts that you could check outkeokalani'nui-1/4/2002
1786What leads you to believe there are problems with C225?613-1/4/2002
1785Thanks, In your opinion, does the drug work and do you think it will ultimatelyElmer-1/4/2002
1784David, My view is that C225 has more problems than it appears in surface. RegaMiljenko Zuanic-1/2/2002
1783Mark, I heard that differently on the CC though you may very well be right. I akeokalani'nui-1/2/2002
1782"There apparently was plenty from the investigators and the IRC on their fimjsolomon-1/2/2002
1781This post basically covers it. messages.yahoo.com613-1/1/2002
1780Hi, bought some 45 Jan calls (45contracts), hope this was smart (or lucky). MTSLTI2, TechInvestorToo-1/1/2002
1779Answer to #1...Do you know of mail service that is delivered at 7:00 P.M. or ExeArthur Radley-1/1/2002
1778Thanks for your comments. It was informative. A couple of questions-- 1. Do Labrador-1/1/2002
1777Lab, I don't think the rumor tag can be placed on this issue. The FDA has veArthur Radley-12/31/2001
1776>>there is no DAMN excuse that IMCL shouldn't have known what was expeLabrador-12/31/2001
1775How is a Q3 possible? This is my current problem with IMCL management. By thei613-12/31/2001
1774I don't disagree with your overall point. But BMS probably did not have muckeokalani'nui-12/31/2001
1773Let me admit that I don't own one share..so I don't have an axe to grindArthur Radley-12/31/2001
1772Their spin was that rolling filing allowed for 3-part filing. Preclinical, mnftkeokalani'nui-12/31/2001
1771From IMCLs own PR on rolling BLA: "The rolling BLA mechanism affords us the613-12/31/2001
1770Frankly, I think the market is being way too kind to the stock given what a totakeokalani'nui-12/31/2001
1769Can you believe this? "Furthermore, ImClone said the FDA believed the docuArthur Radley-12/31/2001
1768Things will remain unknown until after IMCL meets with the FDA. Stock will tra613-12/31/2001
1767IJ, or anyone else, I'm curious about the efficacy and/or purpose of the &qThe Dodgy Ticker-12/31/2001
1766There is no drug that can cure or significantly impact the course of metastatic puborectalis-12/31/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News