SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
18366 73 0 EDIG
Emcee:  JAMES F. CLASPILL III Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17916Ok, back to EDIG. I've read through Fred's latest letter and have theseJimC1997-3/30/2001
17915JT..I have been posting here for a very LONG time. My most recent post is THE OPamela Murray-3/29/2001
17914<i>No, the malice has truly been from Jon. Shame, at times he appears to bcAPSLOCK-3/29/2001
17913Pamela, I am not attacking anyone. Read your own posts, and you will see who isJon Tara-3/29/2001
17912Seems like everyone views the letter from the president as I do : a Non-event.Jack McKibben-3/29/2001
17911cAPSLOCK, Exactly what you posted. I appreciate your candor. Sincerelbob-3/29/2001
17910cAPSLOCK..I have absolutely NO argument with you. The difference between you anPamela Murray-3/29/2001
17909bASHLOCK, I like the shlock part of that name. It reminds me of your muzak.Kerry Sakolsky-3/29/2001
17908Letter from El Predidente... Have fun with this, maybe it'll keep you babiesDave Swanson-3/29/2001
17907Something to talk about on EDIG. My ignore list has been growing again, the lasMichael L-3/29/2001
17906I have seen much more malice from the longs TO JT than the other way around. BucAPSLOCK-3/29/2001
17905<i>If you look way back in cAPSLOCK's posts, you'll see that he clcAPSLOCK-3/29/2001
17904Anything to say about EDIG today, J.N.N.?Jon Tara-3/29/2001
17903If you have nothing to say, PT, why not just not say it!Jon Tara-3/29/2001
17902I have no commentary to add to either of those posts, JimC. Do you require a coJon Tara-3/29/2001
17901Has SI fixed the problems with the gap in sequence #'s of posts here - or arJ.N.N.-3/29/2001
17900No, I was referring to posts #17880 and #17891. Try to keep up. By the way, foJimC1997-3/29/2001
17899>>>PT, you are taking things out of context. If you go back further, I PartyTime-3/29/2001
17898JimC, I am not the one who is going off-topic. I am only responding to off-topiJon Tara-3/29/2001
17897Rather than constantly talking about yourself, Jon, how about discussing the posJimC1997-3/29/2001
17896I was being faceteous, PT. It's terrible PR to promote a product that is unJon Tara-3/29/2001
17895That's what you've made it, Pamela... Don't you have something to tJon Tara-3/29/2001
17894PT, you are taking things out of context. If you go back further, I think you wiJon Tara-3/29/2001
17893"For the record, it was the San Diego Tribune article that brought you herePartyTime-3/29/2001
17892I think cAPSLOCK may have invited JT to critique EDIG. Nowhere in my memory do PartyTime-3/29/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News