SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3392 20 0 CYBR
Emcee:  Tadsamillionaire Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1792 why do I have to call the FDA? I just have to pick up the paper and read about StockDung-5/17/2000
1791 I notice that CYBR hasn't made it to your website. I also like that you admsommovigo-5/17/2000
1790 it does say 3 to 12 months and the stock is down from $31. You will just have tStockDung-5/17/2000
1789 My record on my web site is better that most experts, but then again I am not aStockDung-5/17/2000
1788 Fnord - sometimes you're dead wrong. That's the scary part for people wsommovigo-5/17/2000
1787 Fnord - I'd tell you to call the FDA and ask the same questions, but I don&sommovigo-5/17/2000
1786 Fnord - it's a little different, the two. Posting your opinions on your websommovigo-5/17/2000
1785 Palm Beach Post Article->FDA `looking into' Cyber-Care marketing By JeStockDung-5/17/2000
1784 Unreal.....you have lost it Truthseeker!! >>>It is unfortunate that yMurray_Mac-5/17/2000
1783 Nothing bothers me. I do not have a CYBER CARE in the world. StockDung-5/17/2000
1782 Bitterness, You think you have me pegged.......I have been very comfortable inMurray_Mac-5/17/2000
1781 It is unfortunate that you had to lose so badly, but not all was lost, your incStockDung-5/17/2000
1780 Now that sucks...... Truthseeker, for the life of me I can't understand whMurray_Mac-5/17/2000
1779 DOGLOSER, get over your bitterness as I have suggested. You have been humped, pStockDung-5/17/2000
1778 You want to talk about lies Truthy, >>>Why would insiders sell so lowMurray_Mac-5/17/2000
1777 Truthseeker, Facts.......you want to talk about facts and URL's?? Where iMurray_Mac-5/17/2000
1776 Truthseeker, >>>Sounds just like another B.S. post from ragingbull. KMurray_Mac-5/17/2000
1775 Sounds just like another B.S. post from ragingbull. Keep this trash off SI pleaStockDung-5/17/2000
1774 A rational post from RB, perhaps the final word on the FDA non issue: dbernet-5/17/2000
1773 Thats correct, and since I do not charge for my opinions I do not have to be a StockDung-5/17/2000
1772 Fnord - did you dig up any dirt on the Mayo Clinic yet? Here's the link - Isommovigo-5/17/2000
1771 Fnord - at least you had the ballz to post recommendations on XING on your webssommovigo-5/17/2000
1770 Fnord - here's another one that's biting you in the tuchus: <i> sommovigo-5/17/2000
1769 Fnord - Post every one of your URL's here. You've been serially defamisommovigo-5/17/2000
1768 Fnord - you're right, I misread the document: ""Mr. Schneider issommovigo-5/17/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News