SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1793I believe I have ... We all know at one time the Count ran some sort of site .JustTradeEm-7/22/2003
1792Done what before? Gone on a fishing expedition?Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1791I wonder if you're telling the whole truth, Mr. San Diego Software Engineer.CountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1790Well, well, well. Now if I were so paranoid I would have done this a while ago:CountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1789Then ask them, as you did me.Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1788The IRS obviously was seeking to execute the lien. Count should have been aware Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1787I'd prefer to let them answer my questions, as you did. JBJustTradeEm-7/22/2003
1786I did. You're not paying attention.Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1785"First of all, there are folks posting here that have or do work for or ownJon Tara-7/22/2003
1784Jon, why not respond to this one ? Message 19132443 JBJustTradeEm-7/22/2003
1783OT - Yogi, the police cannot protect us everywhere we go. Sensible people avoid Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1782I asked the Superior Court judge be removed; now we're before the Justices oCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1781IMO, the Count was "looking for trouble" by repeatedly losing money. Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1780Incidentally Cyber/Schwab counsel did not address all issues raised by my petitiCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1779<i>because in so doing by definition it also insulted the Court, who took Jorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1778That's an interesting quote, if you read the news about the new bill headingCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1777<b>REA APPEAL - PART II</b> Indeed, the latter Appellant contact wiCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1776<b>REA APPEAL</b> ARGUMENT I. Respondents’ motion to quash and disCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1775<i>Bad laws are the worst form of tyranny.</i> Edmund Burke I likYogizuna-7/22/2003
1774<b>BERBER APPEAL</b> ARGUMENT I. Berber’s sale of CyberTrader to tCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1773<b>CYBERTRADER/SCHWAB WRIT PETITION</b> COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1772Yes, they would hope I would lose my composure, wouldn't they? So far, it hCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1771>>> I said, simply, that I have no sympathy for such victims. As analogYogizuna-7/22/2003
1770Brandon, do you now or have you ever had a business relationship with a trading JustTradeEm-7/22/2003
1769Hell no, but that is why I have an accountant. I'm guessing that anybody whJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News