SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Is Secession Doable?
An SI Board Since November 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1968 11 0
Emcee:  SilentZ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1793<b>Could the Blue States Secede?</b> slate.msn.comtejek-12/11/2004
1792portland.indymedia.orgtejek-12/11/2004
1791<b>Blue States Secession One Southerner’s Perspective</b> By James tejek-12/11/2004
1790<b>More rationale for an economic blue-state secession</b> Rob senttejek-12/11/2004
1789<b>Blue State Secession </b> by Geoff at 01:23PM (CST) on Decembertejek-12/11/2004
1788<b>Bill Moyers Retiring From TV Journalism </b> By FRAZIER MOORE, tejek-12/11/2004
1787I'm sorry. Its clear the troops in the field are pretty much lying and our gtejek-12/11/2004
1786<i> "They didn't expect to find RPG's hitting our soldiers. TTimF-12/10/2004
1785<i> The war has been going for almost two years. </i> And duringTimF-12/10/2004
1784Its good news that they did not die. What I called good news was the "imprTimF-12/10/2004
1783<I>The guy who wrote that book is from a blue state</I> Yes, and thtejek-12/10/2004
1782<i>re: Are you serious? He's aping Rush? They are very simple people, tejek-12/10/2004
1781re: <i>why don't you look it up, I've got things to do</i> Road Walker-12/10/2004
1780why don't you look it up, I've got things to dolongnshort-12/10/2004
1779link?Road Walker-12/10/2004
1778That's what the polls saylongnshort-12/10/2004
1777"have you seen polls on why women vote for some one??" Yes, the littlcombjelly-12/10/2004
1776John have you seen polls on why women vote for some one??longnshort-12/10/2004
1775re: <i>john are you bald?</i> Not yet. re: <i>In this TV agRoad Walker-12/10/2004
1774john are you bald? In this TV age baldness will kill you in an electionlongnshort-12/10/2004
1773re: <i>Biden is no Eisenhower, not even close.</i> I agree, EisenhoRoad Walker-12/10/2004
1772re: <i>Are you serious? He's aping Rush? They are very simple people, Road Walker-12/10/2004
1771Ready to scream "Suddenly, Democrats are getting a queasy deja vu feelilongnshort-12/10/2004
1770Biden is no Eisenhower, not even close. Both parties tried to get Eisenhower. Thlongnshort-12/10/2004
1769re: <i>Biden is to bald to win the Pres.</i> Eisenhower.Road Walker-12/10/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News