SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GTIS - Will it be a Phoenix or not ?
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2319 13 0 GTIS
Emcee:  Bill Gizzo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1794 Hi Scoot!! You said in your post: Message 3731023 <<<Now then, if V.-3/17/1998
1793 >>> Fact #2: GT Interactive most likely provides 3D Realms with littleScott Miller-3/16/1998
1792 1) Scott, do you have stock options with GTIS. Apogee does. 2) Scott, do you Scott Miller-3/16/1998
1791 >>>The stock raising or lowering has not interest to me here. I would RJC2006-3/16/1998
1790 Bob, I think it was last August when I bought. I missed the peak at around $1Greg Thornton-3/16/1998
1789 Valid questions to Scott Miller for the benefit of all posters: 1) Scott, do yNutty Buddy-3/16/1998
1788 >>> I have no problem with Scott having motivations centered around hiScott Miller-3/16/1998
1787 <<I should have been satisfied with my gain from $9.25 the last time we hRJC2006-3/16/1998
1786 <<<I don't know many long term traders who wouldn't settle forRJC2006-3/16/1998
1785 Bob, From here, $12 - $13 is over a 50% move. This would be worth waiting a yGreg Thornton-3/16/1998
1784 I don't know many long term traders who wouldn't settle for a 50% returRobert Floyd-3/16/1998
1783 Geez, Bob, I would take $12 or $13 -- sounds great to me! If it were a short tRJC2006-3/16/1998
1782 <<<Here is a little news. Cavedog Entertainment and Humongous EnteRJC2006-3/16/1998
1781 <<I want to go on record stating that I feel BOB CHURCHILL goes over-the-RJC2006-3/16/1998
1780 <sigh> Here is a little news...... Cavedog Entertainment and Humongous Scot-3/16/1998
1779 I want to go on record stating that I feel BOB CHURCHILL goes over-the-limit moRobert Floyd-3/16/1998
1778 <<<To everyone else having to read this, I apologize for contributing RJC2006-3/16/1998
1777 <<<Really, you call it "wit"? Hmmm, I call it a waste of timRJC2006-3/16/1998
1776 I have no problem with Scott having motivations centered around himself. We inRobert Floyd-3/16/1998
1775 <<<Let's get this straight...>>> Lie #1. <<<ThRJC2006-3/16/1998
1774 <<<this board is pitiful! Could someone please State the Bull case- lRJC2006-3/16/1998
1773 <<<I would not claim that Scott's true purpose here is one motivatRJC2006-3/16/1998
1772 <<<This is too sad, and speaks volumes about the author. Is anyone besRJC2006-3/16/1998
1771 >>>In yesterday's and today's email was another round of "Mister Pink-3/15/1998
1770 <<Waaa, waaa, waaa, waaa, waaa, Buddy, Bob and Victoria, sniff, sniff, snNutty Buddy-3/15/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News