SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Merck
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1580 80 0 MRK
Emcee:  Alfred W. Post Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
180 Jeff: As far as Merck is concerned I would be invested for the long,long termJT-4/9/1997
179 Hi, JT -- Do you invest for long term or are you a trader? Buying now exposes BlueCrab-4/9/1997
178 Jim: I am new to this thread. I have been following Merck for a while. Is thJT-4/9/1997
177 Larry: IMO support and 200 day mva around 80. Let's see if it holds. AccoJim Garrison-4/9/1997
176 To all; think about shorting this on the open 4/9/97. Just a thought on some quLarry Cascade-4/9/1997
175 Thanks - no I did not know and apreciate your thoughtfulness in informing me. yAlfred W. Post-4/8/1997
174 Alfred: Did you see article on Novartis, Glaxo, and Merck 1,2,3 in market shareJim Garrison-4/7/1997
173 Kevin: You are right about the small range of estimates - Merck is fairly prediJim Garrison-4/7/1997
172 Thanks Jim: That tight pattern of estimates .80 to .87 would seem to indicate Kevin A. Lynch-4/6/1997
171 Kevin: Zacks mean estimate for qtr 3/97 is $.83: Zacks analyst watch report: MJim Garrison-4/6/1997
170 Does anyone have the consensus estimates? I will take 2 cents over the consensuKevin A. Lynch-4/5/1997
169 Merck is reporting on the 16th.Terry Maynard-4/5/1997
168 Any opinions about MRK's earnings due the week of the 17th? Exceed or disaBarron Von Hymen-4/5/1997
167 May I suggest that any discussion of Cytogen move to the thread on Mr. Post'LLLefty-4/5/1997
166 Mike, thanks for this input. I have "discovered" a small firm with apAlfred W. Post-4/5/1997
165 On tonight's Wall Street Week, Health Fund manager cited Merck's PropecUncle Mikey-4/5/1997
164 Perry, I missed to tell you that when I was at Swiss Volksbank we had ananlystAlfred W. Post-4/3/1997
163 As I wrote you yesterday, what brokers do in the USA, banks do in Switzerland aAlfred W. Post-4/3/1997
162 Sorry to disapoint you. In Switzerland investing busines is done through bAlfred W. Post-4/2/1997
161 I would greatly appreciate any and all help in finding research firms that emPerry-4/2/1997
160 TO ALL: Merck's pipeline update biz.yahoo.compragat-4/1/1997
159 In this Merck discussion, we should keep our focus on Merck and only discus comRavBruce-3/31/1997
158 Jim, the local paper had a story on Novartis and feels that for 1997 you can exAlfred W. Post-3/29/1997
157 Hi Jim, Just doday Credit Suisse sent me a fax of a new study on Novartis - twoAlfred W. Post-3/25/1997
156 Alfred: On Novartis, in the reviews you mentioned have you seen an estimate of Jim Garrison-3/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News