SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
306849 644 0 $HGX
Emcee:  patron_anejo_por_favor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
1800There were a lot of these loans done in Baltimore City last year. These were loaGraceZ2/21/2002
1799<<One animal I have not met, however, is the one who is 100-percent mortgapatron_anejo_por_favor2/21/2002
1798Thank you VS.... I saw this on the Clown Thread, more fodder for pondering the MulhollandDrive2/21/2002
1797Yes, bankruptcy can be a setback on your credit history. If there is illness orPatricia2/21/2002
1796Is that you Son??? <<gg>> So truePatricia2/21/2002
1795Thank you Tradelite. This is what I put some young folks thru to get them to rePatricia2/21/2002
1794Not germane? When asking for the gift disclosure, does the financial disclosureMulhollandDrive2/21/2002
1793re: the bankruptcy trend The sad thing about this is that many people don't Tradelite2/21/2002
1792When you are self-employed, it is really hard with the bank in so many instancesPatricia2/21/2002
1791Another cheap shot. :) I put 41% down last October.AC Flyer2/21/2002
1790>Okay now, cut out that Starbucks that costs you and your wife $6 a day....thVS2/21/2002
1789You certainly described the saving-money drill very well, Patricia. My depressiTradelite2/21/2002
1788I think Mrs. Peel understands. Parents who have had good experiences in buying Patricia2/21/2002
1787<i>Do you go back in real estate when the institutions would not take the GraceZ2/21/2002
1786>>"It is too simplistic to assume that someone who puts 20% down is aVS2/21/2002
1785>><i>"It is too simplistic to assume that someone who puts 20% MulhollandDrive2/21/2002
1784You said it all here Mrs. Peel ...fully aware of the person's finances and Patricia2/21/2002
1783Nothing wrong with the way you express yourself! <<gg>>Tradelite2/21/2002
1782>>I agree and I think a "dump" in a good location represents treMulhollandDrive2/21/2002
1781Don't go back that far....sold my first property in 1978. And I think Mrs. PTradelite2/21/2002
1780You are much better at explaining it than I. Thank you You sure know your realPatricia2/21/2002
1779>>$10K or less which do not have to be disclosed F.Y.I. - the limit has bJakeStraw2/21/2002
1778Trader Do you go back in real estate when the institutions would not take the wPatricia2/21/2002
1777Yes I am saying that. These are usually smaller amounts $10K or less which do nMulhollandDrive2/21/2002
1776>> It is too simplistic to assume... Exactly!! And we all know what assumJakeStraw2/21/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):