Netcom | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Netcom

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2601	5	0	NETC

Emcee: Colin Perry	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1801	<<regardless of the cash, MSPG up 184% .....>>?????? Forgive me, b	Oeconomicus	-	9/12/1997
1800	regardless of the cash, MSPG up 184% on the year, nothing to say about that....	Curtis Gruber	-	9/12/1997
1799	<<< Where'd you get the idea that MSPG is almost out of cash.>&	Richard Makowiec	-	9/11/1997
1798	Where'd you get the idea that MSPG is almost out of cash. OK, so they don&#	Oeconomicus	-	9/11/1997
1797	news.com and news.com and news.com and...thats it...gotta run regards, cg	Curtis Gruber	-	9/11/1997
1796	<<<I sure wish I knew who bought and sold the approx. $ 60,000 in Jan/	Curtis Gruber	-	9/11/1997
1795	<<< pay $50/share." >> Lol..even D.G. couldn't be that	Curtis Gruber	-	9/11/1997
1794	<<<The Street still is saying "show me".>>> How lo	Curtis Gruber	-	9/11/1997
1793	Oh dear, if that happens Rich, you are officially banned from the thread(regard	Curtis Gruber	-	9/11/1997
1792	Most definitely NETC is "chump change" compared to other ISPs. Only	Michael Kim	-	9/10/1997
1791	<<< ...how else could over 500k shares trade without causing a crash i	Richard Makowiec	-	9/10/1997
1790	<<< NETC buyout is chump change compared to BBN,CSRV or what PSIX is w	Richard Makowiec	-	9/10/1997
1789	OK, we've got the volume, now we just need price movement. Heads up boys,	Michael Kim	-	9/10/1997
1788	Yeah, Rich, I'm sure you're right....WCOM and T, even AOL have to shop	Curtis Gruber	-	9/10/1997
1787	I hear you bill, but that is the part that kinda troubles me, we can make state	Curtis Gruber	-	9/10/1997
1786	Yeah I know...I probably phrased that one incorrectly. By hitting his desk I ac	Richard Makowiec	-	9/10/1997
1785	Curtis If DG doesn't think the offers are reasonable he doesn't pass th	bill	-	9/10/1997
1784	<<<< Netcom has much value>>>Bill, I couldn't agree wi	Curtis Gruber	-	9/10/1997
1783	Hope u get the calls, Rich, I would like to pick some up myself, don't kno	Curtis Gruber	-	9/10/1997
1782	Lots of volume today, no real direction though, big ole blocks swapping too, do	Curtis Gruber	-	9/10/1997
1781	<<< BTW 200 Jan/98 calls were bought today.>>> Forgot to stat	Richard Makowiec	-	9/10/1997
1780	I've always been in (holdings were minimal though). I did buy more today a	Richard Makowiec	-	9/10/1997
1779	Rich did you get back in today: >>I tried to nibble last Friday at $13.0	Findit	-	9/10/1997
1778	Rich I'm not sure Netcom has much value anymore. They have done poorly in t	bill	-	9/9/1997
1777	Yeah, it's too bad that this pot-of-gold is tainted with DG. What an obstac	Richard Makowiec	-	9/9/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):