SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
18366 73 0 EDIG
Emcee:  JAMES F. CLASPILL III Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18041Catlady, I'm genuinely curious to know why you would want to go to the new InOverMyHead-4/24/2001
18040I'm was only a slightly miffed that I was banned from the new EDIG board. CatLady-4/24/2001
18039Not Lies - Just Innuendo. Why don't people who hate EDIG and post slanderouJ.N.N.-4/24/2001
18038What lies have I told? And no, saying something negative is not stealing, it&#CatLady-4/24/2001
18037No I'm not calling anyone a thief. But when people attempt to destroy MY INJ.N.N.-4/24/2001
18036Even more humorous...they want to censor us..LOLOLOLOL> S.Savant-4/24/2001
18035Are you calling me a thief? I'm excluded from that other Edig board you knoCatLady-4/24/2001
18034CatLady, even you can see that while we EDIG longs have ridden this through goodDave Swanson-4/24/2001
18033Bashers/Malicious Posters outweigh longs 10 to 1 on most EDIG boards. Check outJ.N.N.-4/24/2001
18032I agree that this board is not for personal vendettas. Consequently Jon Tara shJimC1997-4/24/2001
18031We're excluded only because you can't stand the idea that someone might CatLady-4/24/2001
18030JIMC - And isn't it funny how the same people who are crying about not beingJ.N.N.-4/24/2001
18029While I admire the subtle logic of your well-spoken argument, you have said nothJimC1997-4/24/2001
18028Yes, it is. No it isn't. Yes, it is! No, it isn't! IS! ISN'T! CatLady-4/24/2001
18027No CatLady, this has nothing to do with semantics. I just not willing to allow JimC1997-4/24/2001
18026Hey, having the gadget listed in the HS catalog is great publicity. Not quite asCatLady-4/24/2001
18025What does it matter? You folks are really getting caught up in the microcosm oTodd Pagel-4/24/2001
18024Jon... I shall. smile...MaryMaryinRed-4/24/2001
18023That's right Kerry. Catalogs are full of lies. Just ask Jon. I should havJimC1997-4/24/2001
18022Good point Catlady! Why would anyone consider selling products though a CataloguKerry Sakolsky-4/24/2001
18021Go on back to your moderated playground. JT did not lie, a catalog listing is noCatLady-4/24/2001
18020There is no lie there. I put you on ignore on 4/2 when I said that I did. I subJon Tara-4/24/2001
18019Another Jon Tara lie: JT 4/24/01 #18016: <i>"BTW, you are on "JimC1997-4/24/2001
18018Please let us know when your Treo arrives, Jim. I explained in the first post eJon Tara-4/24/2001
18017No Jon, you blatantly lied. It is not "semantics" You cannot cover iJimC1997-4/24/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News