SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19079 388 0 ORCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18079stock kissed 13hdl-5/15/2003
18078<b>Larry Ellison's Windows Envy</b> bloomberg.comElmer Flugum-5/15/2003
18077HI BGR, As a white male, who's 16 years of a large corporation employment erobert b furman-4/18/2003
18076<<does it include any kind of service that allows you to set up a limit orim a survivor-4/17/2003
18075Thanks. I've noticed (watched) a rather nice up movement in CTXS (which I eehasfjord-4/17/2003
18074Look into Interactive Brokers. I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure they hMeDroogies-4/16/2003
18073Nope. I gave up on ETrade. Interactive Brokers, with $1 trader per 100 shares,MeDroogies-4/16/2003
18072does it include any kind of service that allows you to set up a limit order to sLizzie Tudor-4/16/2003
18071==Anybody mess around with "Stock Bskets" on e-trade. They have essentim a survivor-4/16/2003
18070I thought MSFT indicated some fuzzy looks into the future. Nothing good, but noMeDroogies-4/16/2003
18069msft numbers were reasonable, they saw strength in enterprise and that is flowinLizzie Tudor-4/16/2003
18068I think it was the broader extension of the diversity argument, of which I am guMeDroogies-4/16/2003
18067test .... mike r.clark66-4/16/2003
18066On topic, Can you explain why ORCL was down .12 during day and then when up .29ehasfjord-4/16/2003
18065Oracle's hiring practices seem reasonably on topic to me. JMO, Hueyhueyone-4/15/2003
18064Hey, can you guys take this debate somewhere else? Let's try to keep the dilml-4/15/2003
18063I would have to disagree with you on that. Just because everyone is doing sometMeDroogies-4/15/2003
18062No, I wasn't saying that whites should NOT be hired into BET. I was saying MeDroogies-4/15/2003
18061Depends. You're always able to find one lawyer who will be able to make theMeDroogies-4/15/2003
18060Anyway, this discussion is really fruitless, as neither one of us is going to coBGR-4/15/2003
18059But are you required to hire a whole team of foreignners. Not at all. So, if youBGR-4/15/2003
18058not really, BGR, because I as a white manager in IT am not allowed to hire all wLizzie Tudor-4/15/2003
18057I have the employment market - and the hiring managers - on my side. That's BGR-4/15/2003
18056<I>That's really short sighted 'we-were-here-first' mentality.Lizzie Tudor-4/15/2003
18055That's really short sighted 'we-were-here-first' mentality. If you BGR-4/15/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):