SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Naxos Resources (NAXOF)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
20681 31 0 NAXOE
Emcee:  Janez Lomshek Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18156 JLA, It's now an official landslide and outpouring of support:-) Mark mark silvers-3/24/1999
18155 I'm three. JLA jlallen-3/24/1999
18154 RRG, Not only that, but if you read the circular carefully, Fr. Gregory also smark silvers-3/24/1999
18153 TO ALL---One scenario: The special meeting proceeds. The Gregory group coup iRRG-3/24/1999
18152 sh, can you please specificly explain how management manioulated proxies at thLarry Macklin-3/24/1999
18151 sh, You posted <i>We can finally decide based on full disclosure by bothTom Frederick-3/24/1999
18150 SH <<Given incumbent management's manipulation of proxies at the lamark silvers-3/24/1999
18149 Tim, If the present PP fails, I won't care what happens. As far as my own pmark silvers-3/24/1999
18148 Tim, I disagree with your comment about verifiable gold at FL. I believe that Rick Nazaruk-3/24/1999
18147 Paul, I do not believe there has ever been any verified assays of Franklin LakTim Hall-3/23/1999
18146 Tim, The ASC acknowledges there is Gold at Franklin Lake..... Looking back at Paul Salber-3/23/1999
18145 Mark, I have been doing pennance with Richard, just less vocal about it. VBG Tim Hall-3/23/1999
18144 And just because management claims the specially called meeting is invalid doessh-3/23/1999
18143 Is this the first official notice of a shareholders meeting sponsored by the coCharles H Donahue-3/23/1999
18142 Richard <<We are not surprised by the Panel's decision as it regardsmark silvers-3/23/1999
18141 Press release on Yahoo: biz.yahoo.comRichard Mazzarella-3/23/1999
18140 Soxan, <<Also Mark, just so you know, I agree with everything you statemark silvers-3/23/1999
18139 Hey Mark, this just means possible fireworks at the regular Annual meeting, we soxan-3/23/1999
18138 Richard, Like I said, so much for the special meeting........ Hopefully this wmark silvers-3/23/1999
18137 Press release on Yahoo: biz.yahoo.comRichard Mazzarella-3/23/1999
18136 Larry: I agree. Being a US company in my understanding requires more controlleBGM-3/23/1999
18135 Great news!!! I like how the current management handled this situation. RickRick Nazaruk-3/23/1999
18134 Larry: I agree. Their lack of ownership bothers me. When I received the proxy BGM-3/23/1999
18133 Larry, News release. So much for the special meeting...... Markmark silvers-3/23/1999
18132 Mark, right now there is no benefit, especially considering the cost. In the fLarry Macklin-3/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):