SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
METRICOM - Wireless Data Communications
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3376 49 0 MCOM
Emcee:  Stephen Ettorre Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1826 Sherm, I really belive that that advantages of a higher data rate HDL supplies John Hauser-12/6/1999
1825 LEHMAN report indicates that speeds up to 10 times the 128 k are being considerrrufff-12/6/1999
1824 I thought there were a host of other companies out there offering differing forHerc-12/6/1999
1823 That's how I feel, MCOM will be first to market, but it's difficult to Sherman Chen-12/5/1999
1822 thanks...hdr does look to have potential...2.4megs is very impressive...and commact-12/5/1999
1821 QCOM's High Data Rate technology. See link posted by Sir Caxton Rhodes.Sherman Chen-12/5/1999
1820 sherman, new to the thread...im sure this has been openly discussed many times mact-12/5/1999
1819 glenn, if i am not mistaken, they "proposed" to have their cellmac asmact-12/5/1999
1818 IMO, the only mobile wireless competition to MCOM in the near future is HDR. TSherman Chen-12/5/1999
1817 It got the standard. That is why the stock move up significantly last week. IGlenn-12/5/1999
1816 glenn, dont believe ntro and metricom are in same mkt...ntro targets small to mmact-12/5/1999
1815 Check out NTRO which specializes in wireless broadband. It won the standard forGlenn-12/5/1999
1814 GCHC --the China play---I put together a few posts to show some comments DenmoBrent Gilbertson-12/5/1999
1813 It wasn't just QCOM. My mind digest lots of small snippets of info. to givHerc-12/5/1999
1812 I think you are referring to QCOM's HDR. Read the previous discussion abouSherman Chen-12/5/1999
1811 THREAD, pardon my ignorance, but isn't technology coming on board that willHerc-12/5/1999
1810 Dude, that's a mind-blower. Thanks for the food, JHJohn Hauser-12/5/1999
1809 Let's just say that the acceptance of HDR by carriers has yet to be proven.Sherman Chen-12/5/1999
1808 Food for thought: 1) Metricom files shelf registration to raise up to $1.2 bilSherman Chen-12/5/1999
1807 So Sherm, you're telling me to believe Cax most of the time. Except for thJohn Hauser-12/5/1999
1806 Caxton, You're still upset for buying MCOM at 8 and selling it at 8 1/2. Sherman Chen-12/5/1999
1805 John, I read somewhere that U.S. West did try HDR and rejected it (for now). Sherman Chen-12/5/1999
1804 Me. CaxtonCaxton Rhodes-12/5/1999
1803 Cax...you say, "No large carriers have gone away from HDR, they just havenJohn Hauser-12/5/1999
1802 That's the plan, as long as I make more than Sherm. CaxtonCaxton Rhodes-12/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):