SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
American Eco (ECGOF, ECX on Toronto exchange)
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2841 13 0 ECX
Emcee:  david james Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1841 A fall to $10 would require a 17% gain just to return us to old levels. I sharHunter Vann-3/2/1998
1840 This is ridiculous, now even if the report is ok, 1/2 the gains would be justFrederick Langford-3/2/1998
1839 Call me crazy, but I might nibble on some March 10's or 12's either TueHunter Vann-3/2/1998
1838 How did you find out about the delay?What time on Thursday? TIA mphmph-3/2/1998
1837 earnings delayed until thurs. with conf. call thurs. John unbelievable.john carr-3/2/1998
1836 David, I owned FGII a month or 2 back and stopped out of it around $32. Like MARK BARGER-3/2/1998
1835 Thanks Bill, This is what I posted over there. Message 3569222 Daviddavid james-3/1/1998
1834 Jim, Nice analysis of the NOLs. If they don't address this in the conferedavid james-3/1/1998
1833 David, Nice job on the analysis of ECGOF and FGII over on the strictly drillinBill Hyres-3/1/1998
1832 Well, tomorrow's the big day. A big day for all ECGOF shareholders that weMARK BARGER-3/1/1998
1831 Some of you may find the upcoming issue of Scientific American interesting for Brian P.-3/1/1998
1830 Sorry Bill: URL was incomplete... here it is members.aol.com GastonFrancois H. Gaston-3/1/1998
1829 Jim: Great post. NOL's are complicated animals...and the tax code changesDuncan-3/1/1998
1828 Gaston, Tried the URL but was rejected. Agreed on the quality of this board. TBill Hyres-3/1/1998
1827 Thank god somebody knows about NOLs, warrants, options and so forth. Great boaFrancois H. Gaston-3/1/1998
1826 Thanks for the info. Very informative. Regarding Point 1, I think the tacit aHarry_Behemoth-3/1/1998
1825 I don't like to be the one who announces bad news, but 1. When you calculaJimieA-3/1/1998
1824 David, NOLS are known to the street as they are to us, and would probably be deFrederick Langford-3/1/1998
1823 David- I believe the 7.826 in NOLs is in Canadian $. Did you notice the 2002 aHarry_Behemoth-2/28/1998
1822 With all the attention we are now getting from the new funds, the new institutidavid james-2/28/1998
1821 Thanks Chien, That $7.826 mill in NOLs in 1998 represents 39 cents with the david james-2/28/1998
1820 DBCO's tax loss carried forward is on page F19 of the 10K (in thousands): Chien Li-2/28/1998
1819 So POTENTIALLY we may see $2 THIS year if DBCO contributes somewhat to the bottHarry_Behemoth-2/28/1998
1818 As was mentioned before, because of the losses that DBCO has incurred over the david james-2/28/1998
1817 Short Interest in DBCO 02/98 562,697 415,995 1.35 01/98 516,465 182,8E.Bogusch-2/28/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News