SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF, a New Plateau
An SI Board Since February 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2243 64 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1843Roughly what proportion of those popular threads are daytrading threads? I woulThomas M.-3/24/2003
1842How many individuals does it take to beat a prisoner of war? Twenty one. Five scaram(o)uche-3/23/2003
1841That's also sad......... only one biofreak. None of you guys who providescaram(o)uche-3/23/2003
1840<i>The sector has been completely abandoned.</i> You might like to nigel bates-3/23/2003
1839The beta version of the "new look" SI has a feature where you can see scaram(o)uche-3/22/2003
1838:-) (eom)scaram(o)uche-3/18/2003
1837Would be nicer if they leave the mic on for the middle 15 minutes.keokalani'nui-3/18/2003
1836never attended SG Cowen, but this is nice..... <i>Each company is presentscaram(o)uche-3/18/2003
1835Short-sellers reverse course, bet on stock rally Monday March 17, 3:40 pm ET Bykeokalani'nui-3/17/2003
1834Aventis...... the company seems to be run by idiots. Anybody else notice hoscaram(o)uche-3/17/2003
1833Volume is great to see. There are about two gazillion shares to distribute.scaram(o)uche-3/15/2003
1832TLRK actually had decent volume yesterday to go with the nearly 3% gain.tom pope-3/15/2003
1831No, not really. But try GILD? Cheers! Rickscaram(o)uche-3/14/2003
1830Wasn't this MCDE's dept?? news.bbc.co.uk DAKLLCF-3/14/2003
1829If you want to find another arrow, dear Saint Sebastian, volume was well below ttom pope-3/13/2003
1828tlrk not even + a dime. arghhh. eom (what else is there to say??).mopgcw-3/13/2003
1827No hissing? Well then.... I've been trying to figure out insm's prospekeokalani'nui-3/13/2003
1826In general but with enough exceptions (most of which I own), solid biotechs are scaram(o)uche-3/13/2003
1825Thanks, Jason. Zhang perspective very much appreciated! >> It would be nscaram(o)uche-3/13/2003
1824I've always regarded Zhang as an excellent analyst. He was one of the few JFitnich-3/13/2003
1823preparing for the circus........ Independent Research Group Builds Equity Reseascaram(o)uche-3/13/2003
1822>> I may get hissed at << No hissing allowed. All (sincere) suggesscaram(o)uche-3/13/2003
1821I may get hissed at, but perhaps RIGL could make it as 50 bagger. It would onlytuck-3/13/2003
1820It is, of course, assumed that a wildly successful business plan (diversificatioscaram(o)uche-3/12/2003
1819Rick, I'd say KOSN is a big stretch as a 50-bagger. More reasonable as a poBiomaven-3/12/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):