SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Vari-L (VARL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2702 34 0 VARLE
Emcee:  JakeStraw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1852 <i>I'm wondering if over-all weakness can be blamed on QCOM. ThoughtsWyätt Gwyön-1/27/2000
1851 I personally keep seeing the fact that this is a really small company. In factMark Oliver-1/27/2000
1850 pat, "overall weakness can be blamed on QCOM." my opinion is that tJBruin-1/27/2000
1849 I was on the road and missed the CC and haven't had time to listen to replapat mudge-1/27/2000
1848 I'm spread a bit thin and don't know what "subscriber components&qMark Oliver-1/27/2000
1847 Quote from last quarter's release: Sherman noted that total commercial ordeAllegoria-1/27/2000
1846 G'day all - I ve thought about it. I agree it really boils down to the rampBosco-1/26/2000
1845 <b>A great summary of the CC by Paytient/Robert from TMF</b> sourcuel_Dave-1/26/2000
1844 Having the capacity to meet demand is my only concern as well. From what Ilazarre-1/26/2000
1843 Yes Voop, The following are my quick notes; It was very quiet only one person auel_Dave-1/26/2000
1842 anybody listen to the conference call? voop-1/26/2000
1841 The VARL financials were in my view excellent. I was caught off guard by the dimozerd-1/26/2000
1840 WhAt A sHaKeOuT HuH..... you've got to be long this company. d.aD.Austin-1/26/2000
1839 ONE COMMENT - gotta catch a jetplane . . . VARL did get it's number then sRobert Sheldon-1/26/2000
1838 G'day all - I guess people here are not in a good mood, but at least the deBosco-1/26/2000
1837 Eric, I'm in just above you and I'm holding. I do question whether manDutch-1/26/2000
1836 Down around 4. Ouch! I am glad that I sold around 1/4 of my shares with about Eric Hong-1/26/2000
1835 I really do love this. The Q was excellent, imo. The northerly trajectory for elazarre-1/26/2000
1834 Bid 30 1/4 Allegoria-1/26/2000
1833 >>Varl doesn't have a very high P/E ratio With a trailing p/e of .5JakeStraw-1/26/2000
1832 Nothing about the earnings report bothers me...it's just that high expectatJakeStraw-1/26/2000
1831 Varl doesn't have a very high P/E ratio, I would suspect that it won't Frank Ferrari-1/26/2000
1830 I know, I thought about that too...is it the Q-2-Q bothering you or top-line? Allegoria-1/26/2000
1829 I hope I'm wrong, but it wouldn't surprise me to see VARL go down todayJakeStraw-1/26/2000
1828 $0.57 versus $0.48... INCOME STATEMENT DATA Allegoria-1/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News