SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Naxos Resources (NAXOF)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
20681 31 0 NAXOE
Emcee:  Janez Lomshek Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18556 Soxan, I wish you luck on these shares..... I still wouldn't mind some at amark silvers-4/7/1999
18555 Hi Mark, I'm sorry but I really hope we don't get down to a dime, I cousoxan-4/7/1999
18554 Looks like we might end the day at .51 on 134,000+ volume. Not a bad recovery Tom Frederick-4/7/1999
18553 By the way, all buys now at .50...and rising with 111,000 shares so far. Tom FTom Frederick-4/7/1999
18552 Once again, a day late and a dollar short. Tom F. Tom Frederick-4/7/1999
18551 lol Jerry may already have the patent. Henry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
18550 Mark, You gotta call Jerry on this. If there is a person who could make that aTom Frederick-4/7/1999
18549 just pointing out that you and our judgement impaired leader are as one on thisHenry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
18548 soxan, I would expect a little price recovery just based on the elimination of Richard Mazzarella-4/7/1999
18547 Soxan, I hope they keep selling(seriously). I also think we should go on a bumark silvers-4/7/1999
18546 Looks like the bleeding has stopped, last trade at .45 with 90,000shares so farsoxan-4/7/1999
18545 Henry, okay he wants ginger.... so what? I spent my teenage years locked the smark silvers-4/7/1999
18544 Sorry..it's a binary question, no alternate selections. answer definitely Henry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
18543 Henry, She's too good looking for him. Given past performance, he is more mark silvers-4/7/1999
18542 yup I was pretty sure that was your position. I have it on good authority fromHenry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
18541 Why not. We haven't had a got fist fight around here for at least two days.Henry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
18540 Henry, Clearly Ginger. Why? mark silvers-4/7/1999
18539 Let's not get into this here. There's enough hard scrabble on the threajlallen-4/7/1999
18538 I have more potentially damaging evidence on you. Let us return for a moment toHenry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
18537 Actually, I would say Ken Starr is an honorable man who is having a hard time djlallen-4/7/1999
18536 Tom, Actually I am forming a committee to look into the use of dried soy bean hmark silvers-4/7/1999
18535 Henry, OK, we'll take it easy on the tree hugger. No more baseball talk. WTom Frederick-4/7/1999
18534 lol will they get you to buy my Naxos at cost? Henry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
18533 Henry <<in the interest of precision it is tree-hugging, Clinton-lovingmark silvers-4/7/1999
18532 in the interest of precision it is <i>tree-hugging, Clinton-loving, draftHenry Volquardsen-4/7/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):