SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intel Corporation (INTC)
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
186894 739 0 INTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
185569re: <i>Did I like working there - no, it was very tough. Am I happy I leftgreg s-1/22/2008
185568<i>Hope that's clear.</i> Perfectly. Your poor judgment will noElmer Phud-1/22/2008
185567No, not disgruntled at all, in fact, I am very gruntled, thank you very much. Imarkjbloggs-1/22/2008
185566A quick calculation shows that $0.002 probably meant $270,000 to Gordon Moore...Elmer Phud-1/22/2008
185565re: <i>I think you are assigning far too much significance to a very minorgreg s-1/22/2008
185564So a fraction of a cent typo means Intel is down the tubes. I think you are assElmer Phud-1/22/2008
185563>> Sorry, my point is that a public mistake like this illustrates that theSarmad Y. Hermiz-1/22/2008
185562Sorry, my point is that a public mistake like this illustrates that the code of markjbloggs-1/22/2008
185561<i>Screwing up a dividend increase announcement is a significant mistake. Elmer Phud-1/21/2008
185560>> Does anyone know if Intel was buying shares over the last week? Do I &Sarmad Y. Hermiz-1/21/2008
185559<i>1. Screwing up a dividend increase announcement is a significant mistakchipguy-1/21/2008
185558Does anyone know if Intel was buying shares over the last week? I know they beliphroto-1/21/2008
1855571. Screwing up a dividend increase announcement is a significant mistake. I thGVTucker-1/21/2008
185556At the rate Intel was falling and AMD was rising last week, how many weeks untiDan3-1/21/2008
185555I think you're over reacting just a bit. While AMD would never pay a dividElmer Phud-1/21/2008
185554He is very pro-AMD.Gloo-1/21/2008
185553then he truly belongs on this threadDRBES-1/21/2008
185552You seem to have lost touch with reality.Gloo-1/21/2008
185551So you consider a mistake like this trivial? This should be humiliating for themarkjbloggs-1/21/2008
185550"internal samples have been fabricated" I definitely think "fabrThe Duke of URL©-1/19/2008
185549AMD says 45nm quad-cores out of Fab 36 with aggressive ramp in 2H08 Print etchmeister-1/18/2008
185548All along the way, analysts changed the numbers based up the next quarter's etchmeister-1/18/2008
185547Your posts are descending badly, thus demonstrating you know AMD will soon be fiGloo-1/18/2008
185546LOL!!! AMD's bankruptcy in 2009 will hurt you badly.Gloo-1/18/2008
185545<i>What a silly over dramatization of a trivial issue.</i> yes, intmuzosi-1/18/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News