SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intel Corporation (INTC)
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
186894 739 0 INTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
185669Elmer, The problem with raising dividends is that a dividend once raised cannoSaturn V-4/16/2008
185668<i>Nothing really "benefits" a stockholder until he sells at a pElmer Phud-4/16/2008
185667Nothing really "benefits" a stockholder until he sells at a profit. I stock bull-4/16/2008
185666<i>A high eps is one metric that attracts buyers which will normally causeElmer Phud-4/16/2008
185665A stock buy back in only one metric that affects the eps. There are many other mstock bull-4/16/2008
185664A high eps is one metric that attracts buyers which will normally cause the stocstock bull-4/16/2008
185663<i>Let's not forget one very important thing about buy backs. When a cElmer Phud-4/16/2008
185662Bob, re ><i>this sector will once again get respect.</i>< for Gottfried-4/15/2008
185661No I find after hours trades to be reported inaccurately and also the land of marobert b furman-4/15/2008
185660the last large trade after hours shows as $20.69 [same as Monday's close] anGottfried-4/15/2008
185659Re: <i>Let's not forget one very important thing about buy backs. WhenDan3-4/15/2008
185658Not real sure on the formal definition. Tech has been handed such a bad wrap forobert b furman-4/15/2008
185657Let's not forget one very important thing about buy backs. When a company bustock bull-4/15/2008
185656much better than if they don't buy back at all. Let me hasten to add, afterThe Duke of URL©-4/15/2008
185655How does it work if they give twice the buyback out in option gifts to the execsBWAC-4/15/2008
185654No, if the cash used as the buy back is "extra" cash, then the buybackThe Duke of URL©-4/15/2008
185653Robert, I agree but is "growth" the right term to use here? A growth sElmer Phud-4/15/2008
185652<i> With a share buyback each share owns a bigger piece of the company.<Elmer Phud-4/15/2008
185651Hi ephud, I agree. There is some validity that major mature semi's are outrobert b furman-4/15/2008
185650ephud, RE: <i>Buybacks only benefit those who sell their shares, not the GVTucker-4/15/2008
185649I would prefer Intel raised dividends still further rather than buyback shares. Elmer Phud-4/15/2008
185648Good question the value of their JV with Numonics? Bobrobert b furman-4/15/2008
185647Thanks. I agree, especially if they can maintain the margins and continue to grKirk ©-4/15/2008
185646>> So why is it a good quarter when what I own went down in book value? BSarmad Y. Hermiz-4/15/2008
185645Thanks. That makes sense. The idea then is the shares are more valuable than cKirk ©-4/15/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):