SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intel Corporation (INTC)
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
186894 739 0 INTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
185719Many years ago I owned AMD and the pattern was the same - more hype than substanwillcousa-6/24/2008
185718>> It may be that the fact of the lawsuit is most important to AMD right nSarmad Y. Hermiz-6/24/2008
185717It may be that the fact of the lawsuit is most important to AMD right now - it gwillcousa-6/24/2008
185716>> The question is why ? Is AMD hoping for more evidence to surface in thSarmad Y. Hermiz-6/24/2008
185715<i>More amazing is that AMD requested a delay to 2010</i> The questSaturn V-6/24/2008
185714>> This may eventually end up in front of the Supremes. My lay-person'Sarmad Y. Hermiz-6/23/2008
185713RE:he cited a series of Supreme Court cases, going back 20 years, that has come drjohn-6/23/2008
185712Thanks, Gottfried. this paragraph summarizes Intel's position. As far as I kSarmad Y. Hermiz-6/20/2008
185711A.M.D. and Its War With Intel ><i>interesting summary of the complaintsGottfried-6/20/2008
185710What do you think about this? I recall you're following closely STX To: etetchmeister-6/19/2008
185709Intel's exports should do well also. The negative view was that US economy sSarmad Y. Hermiz-6/19/2008
185708<i>Back in December, negativists said that strong demand for Intel processetchmeister-6/19/2008
185707Intel fires up solar spin-off New venture SpectraWatt is set to break ground onJakeStraw-6/17/2008
185706FTC opens formal antitrust probe on Intel marketwatch.comGottfried-6/6/2008
185705Intel will introduce Tukwila and an associated chipset called Boxboro towards thchipguy-5/26/2008
185704Intel Itanium to go quad-core in early 2009 Alliance to promote use of Itanium JakeStraw-5/19/2008
185703Lehman lifts price target to 26$. biz.yahoo.com Of note, the most recent news dr_elis-5/15/2008
185702<i>It is probably also good news for whomever's tools are needed to maElmer Phud-5/1/2008
185701"Intel has added a whole 45 nm fab to its 3 65 nm fabs, and still can'tKirk ©-5/1/2008
185700You post is dead wrong, but it has a nice iambic pentameter to it.The Duke of URL©-5/1/2008
185699<i>Let's not forget one very important thing about buy backs. When a cbrushwud-5/1/2008
185698The current shortage will keep revenue and profits from blowing out all previousSarmad Y. Hermiz-4/30/2008
185697Sarmad - Comments on Marketwatch about the Atom shortage: Intel's (INTC) nElmer Phud-4/30/2008
185696>> As far as INTC is concerned I don´t like their sluggish 45nm ramp.Sarmad Y. Hermiz-4/30/2008
185695It is as yet unclear why Apple bought PA Semi. In contrast to Steve Jobs explanadr_elis-4/30/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News