SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Lunn Industries (LUNN)
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1436 0 0 LUNN
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
186 Doug: As long as you are making the rounds, whats the TA on LUNN? ThanksInstock-8/22/1997
185 .24 X 4 quarters = .96 (1997- same earnings in all four quarters , just to makeInstock-8/21/1997
184 Doug: Ok, are you recording our conversations now?? LOL >"I told InstocInstock-8/21/1997
183 Instock, "Later Later" Does that mean MUCH LATER? Cheers. JohnJohn S. Haines-8/21/1997
182 Thanks Sergio. I guess many of us would feel rather humble if that were not thJohn S. Haines-8/21/1997
181 Max, thanks for your numbers. '96 earnings for TPG were seriously better tSergio H-8/21/1997
180 Enjoy following the discussion here. I believe today's posts are citing Max Fletcher-8/21/1997
179 I'll download it tomorrow morning. Thanks Doug. I'm happy about all tSergio H-8/21/1997
178 Sergio, I don't want to sound like I am hyping LUNN, but an earlier post mDoug R-8/21/1997
177 Omer, you are welcome. We've picked up lots of friends doing our thing. WSergio H-8/21/1997
176 Sergio, thanks. I appreciate the research,write-up and the support provided by Omer B.-8/21/1997
175 Jeff, thanks.Sergio H-8/21/1997
174 Omer, the calculation of $11 in the report was based on a lower stock price forSergio H-8/21/1997
173 sergio in regard to the decimal point, it could happen to anyone. your researTripleWitching-8/21/1997
172 Instock, thanks again. You confirmed my understanding. I was trying to reconcilOmer B.-8/21/1997
171 I agree completely with you. I have been with this stock when it was in its 70jimmy lim-8/21/1997
170 Omer: i beleave if you take TEN and multiply by the current price of LUNN, you Instock-8/21/1997
169 Sergio and Instock, thanks for the clarification re 1 to 10. Any idea about theOmer B.-8/21/1997
168 Sergio: I just checked our write up. The mistake is in there too. Opps! One forInstock-8/21/1997
167 From LUNN's June 10th Press release: >Pursuant to such exchange, Lunn stInstock-8/21/1997
166 OOPS !!! My mistake Instock. Conversion is .1 not .01 as I thought. Thanks forSergio H-8/21/1997
165 Instock, Yes, 1 share for every 10 of LUNN is what I was told by someone at theLucci-8/21/1997
164 Yes, I bought 20,000 @ 7/8 and 10.000 @ 1 5/8 and sold it all in the last severRAY WACLAWSKY-8/21/1997
163 Instock, I think that the conversion rate is .01, not .1 Ray, the earnings perSergio H-8/21/1997
162 Thanks! I was glad to see they came though with the NEWS today and not next weInstock-8/21/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News