SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
EntreMed (ENMD)
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2135 59 0 ENMD
Emcee:  Mark Wise Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1860 This is not classic chemo by any stretch. These proteins may work very well inDavid Winkler-3/19/1999
1859 marc ultra Yes. They have to show it's active, and injecting mice is the oNature Boy-3/19/1999
1858 how about a endo-angio combo? I really would like to know if there's synernotyet-3/19/1999
1857 NatureBoy How would you expect ENMD to get an IND and start human trials if thmarc ultra-3/19/1999
1856 Does ENMD know what it's role is in developing these drugs? There's plNature Boy-3/19/1999
1855 From AACR Use of ENMD human AS in mice 315   Recombinant human Angiosmarc ultra-3/18/1999
1854 you have never been stupid because you read them. only those who decide not tonotyet-3/18/1999
1853 I just noticed that the "Subscriber" field indicates the university Itnsaf-3/17/1999
1852 Even if one "sneaks around" a bit, eventually (when you get near the Jon Koplik-3/17/1999
1851 << That website requires a password etc. >> I wasn't asked for tnsaf-3/17/1999
1850 That website requires a password etc. If you are a member, and there is no copJon Koplik-3/17/1999
1849 The Duke article is available at pnas.org Jason tnsaf-3/17/1999
1848 I see your point, but am not as familiar with the ins and outs of protein desigACC-3/17/1999
1847 Back a month or two ago, when ENMD went up to about $35 a share, my understandiJon Koplik-3/17/1999
1846 notyet says <<everybody is stupid >> i read 'em nothing new cNature Boy-3/17/1999
1845 Your point about specificity is well taken but I disagree with you on the globaJohn Starks-3/17/1999
1844 everybody is stupid unless they read THE LANCET 353,732 (1999) notyet-3/17/1999
1843 Jon, what do you mean by in reply 1833 "saving cancer patients' lives&Angelo-3/17/1999
1842 <<The question is, what will happen sooner: (a) the production of these pACC-3/17/1999
1841 Regent: Care to elaborate on the WSJ article? Or does "Nuf said" aNature Boy-3/17/1999
1840 In today's WSJ article, Dr Pizzo says fugetaboudit for humans. 'Nuf saiRegent-3/17/1999
1839 Good science is not necessarily synonymous with good business acumen. Nice posSword-3/16/1999
1838 The most likely small molecule would be the active fragment of Angiostatin. EnDavid Winkler-3/16/1999
1837 I think you are doing a little of what you accused others of doing -- assuming Jon Koplik-3/16/1999
1836 It's true that sometimes "the establishment" makes a mistake and Fred Puppet-3/16/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):