SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intel Corporation (INTC)
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
186894 739 0 INTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
186219muzosi Are you saying that the customer typically accepts raw wafers and test iElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186218test is complicated mainly because there are several different components in an muzosi15/2/2011
186217Exactly. None of that is in place as yet. AFAIK. And who provides the test capaElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186216<i>Either the customer presents a complete complete mask set to Intel <muzosi15/2/2011
186215<i>the foundry has very little ip; most ip comes from third party providerElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186214<i>I can't see Intel doing SOCs because Intel doesn't have the IP muzosi15/2/2011
186213muzosi Thanks for your insights. I can't see Intel doing SOCs because InteElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186212the layout is in the standard cells already. any sc users are already giving up muzosi-5/2/2011
186211one other board is populated with enough bs generators to drive any snr significmuzosi25/2/2011
186210FWIW Reports: Intel to fab PLDs for second startup 5/2/2011 6:29 PM EDT SAN FRAElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186209There is layout to consider as well. They won't get the compaction Intel getElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186208Now why can't you make reasonable contributions on other boards as well?Elmer Phud15/2/2011
186207<i>they're not going to give their proprietary flow away </i> dmuzosi15/2/2011
186206ARM cores are almost exclusively synthesized. The largest difficulty of getting muzosi25/2/2011
186205Intel manufactured X-Scale alongside x86 in the past. The problem I see is tooElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186204Elmer, Agreed. Doing small lots for lots of customers is much different than whgugie-5/2/2011
186203Almost certainly an announcement about a process breakthrough at 22nm. Seeing asElmer Phud15/2/2011
186202Intel tells CNBC it will be making its "most significant technology announcJakeStraw-5/2/2011
186201If you wanted to fill a new fab with mobile devices - that(aapl) would be the nurobert b furman-5/2/2011
186200gugie Personally, I think it would be a good idea for Intel to get into the fouElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186199Re: It takes a great deal of infrastructure to support foundry customers What ifgugie-5/2/2011
186198It takes a great deal of infrastructure to support foundry customers and Intel iElmer Phud-5/2/2011
186197Intel Pursuing Apple’s Foundry Biz, Piper Jaffray Analyst Says blogs.wsj.com BaJakeStraw-5/2/2011
186196Intel: No Longer a Low Growth Company April 29, 2011 seekingalpha.comJakeStraw-5/2/2011
186195To: Paul Engel who wrote (62406) 8/17/1998 9:28:00 PM From: Larry Loeb Read Repletchmeister-4/29/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News